Empilhamento de ar e compressão torácica aumentam o pico de fluxo da tosse em pacientes com distrofia muscular de Duchenne / Air stacking and chest compression increase peak cough flow in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficiência da tosse através do uso de duas manobras manuais de auxílio à tosse. MÉTODOS: Foram selecionados 28 pacientes portadores de distrofia muscular de Duchenne em uso de ventilação mecânica não-invasiva noturna e CVF < 60 por cento do previsto. O pico de fluxo da tosse (PFT) foi medido, com o paciente sentado, em quatro momentos: com esforço expiratório máximo (EEM) de forma espontânea (basal), EEM associado à compressão torácica, EEM após empilhamento de ar com bolsa de ventilação e EEM com o uso dessas duas técnicas (técnica combinada). As três últimas medições foram realizadas em ordem aleatória. Os resultados foram comparados usando o teste de correlação de Pearson e ANOVA para medidas repetidas, seguido do teste post hoc de Tukey (p < 0,05). RESULTADOS: A idade média dos pacientes foi de 20 ± 4 anos, e a CVF média foi de 29 ± 12 por cento. A média de PFT basal, com compressão torácica, com empilhamento de ar e com o uso da técnica combinada foi 171 ± 67, 231 ± 81, 225 ± 80, e 292 ±86 L/min, respectivamente. Os resultados com o uso da técnica combinada foram maiores que aqueles com o uso das duas técnicas separadamente [F(3,69) = 67,07; p < 0,001]. CONCLUSÕES: As técnicas de compressão torácica e de empilhamento de ar foram eficientes para aumentar o PFT. No entanto, a combinação dessas manobras teve um efeito aditivo significativo (p < 0,0001).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cough efficiency using two manually-assisted cough techniques. METHODS: We selected 28 patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The patients were receiving noninvasive nocturnal ventilatory support and presented FVC values < 60 percent of predicted. Peak cough flow (PCF) was measured, with the patient seated, at four time points: at baseline, during a spontaneous maximal expiratory effort (MEE); during an MEE while receiving chest compression; during an MEE after air stacking with a manual resuscitation bag; and during an MEE with air stacking and compression (combined technique). The last three measurements were conducted in random order. The results were compared using Pearson's correlation test and ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 20 ± 4 years, and the mean FVC was 29 ± 12 percent. Mean PCF at baseline, with chest compression, after air stacking and with the use of the combined technique was 171 ± 67, 231 ± 81, 225 ± 80, and 292 ± 86 L/min, respectively. The results obtained with the use of the combined technique were significantly better than were those obtained with the use of either technique alone (F[3.69] = 67.07; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both chest compression and air stacking techniques were efficient in increasing PCF. However, the combination of these two techniques had a significant additional effect (p < 0.0001).

Calidad metodológica de un artículo de tratamiento de cáncer gástrico adoptado como protocolo por algunos hospitales chilenos / Methodological quality of an article on the treatment of gastric cancer adopted as protocol by some Chilean hospitals

Background: Surgery is a curative treatment for gastric cancer (GC). As relapse is frequent, adjuvant therapies such as postoperative chemo radiotherapy have been tried. In Chile, some hospitals adopted Macdonald's study as a protocol for the treatment of GC. Aim: To determine methodological quality and internal and external validity of the Macdonald study. Material and method: Three instruments were applied that assess methodological quality. A critical appraisal was done and the internal and external validity of the methodological quality was analyzed with two scales: MINCIR (Methodology and Research in Surgery), valid for therapy studies and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials), valid for randomized controlled trials (RCT). Guides and scales were applied by 5 researchers with training in clinical epidemiology. Results: The reader's guide verified that the Macdonald study was not directed to answer a clearly defined question. There was random assignment, but the method used is not described and the patients were not considered until the end of the study (36% of the group with surgery plus chemo radiotherapy did not complete treatment). MINCIR scale confirmed a multicentric RCT, not blinded, with an unclear randomized sequence, erroneous sample size estimation, vague objectives and no exclusion criteria. CONSORT system proved the lack of working hypothesis and specific objectives as well as an absence of exclusion criteria and identification of the primary variable, an imprecise estimation of sample size, ambiguities in the randomization process, no blinding, an absence of statistical adjustment and the omission of a subgroup analysis. Conclusion: The instruments applied demonstrated methodological shortcomings that compromise the internal and external validity of the study.

Changing trends in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

The management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has advanced because of improvements in mechanical ventilators, promotion of antenatal steroids, availability of surfactant and overall advancements in neonatal intensive care. Intermittent mandatory ventilation still forms the mainstay of assisted ventilation. Newer modes of ventilation have not delivered the results as promised. Because of the continued high incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, there is a renewed interest in non-invasive modes of ventilation like CPAP and nasal IPPV. The present trend is to follow gentle ventilatory strategies accepting higher arterial carbon dioxide and lower oxygen. The role of antenatal steroids has been established beyond doubt but still they fall short of universal acceptance. Surfactant replacement therapy is the standard of care for RDS but beyond the reach of majority in India. Postnatal steroids are out of vogue because of probable links with cerebral palsy and abnormal neurological outcomes.

Cirugía de las metástasis pulmonares: nuestra experiencia / Surgery of the lung metastases: our experience

Se presentan 40 pacientes operados por metástasis pulmonares. Correspondieron a 31 carcinomas y 9 sarcomas, siendo los origenes más frecuentes el carcinoma de colon, de mama y osteosarcoma con 6 casos cada uno. La edad promedio fue de 53 años para los carcinomas y de 26 años para los sarcomas. Treinta y seis casos (80%) fueron asintomáticos, 32 diagnosticados por control radiológico periódico y 4 por TAC periódica. La TAC de toráx se constituyó en el estudio más útil para la evaluación de las lesiones torácicas. En los 40 pacientes se realizaron 45 resecciones, 1 caso se operó 3 veces y 3 casos, 2 veces. La resección de metástasis pulmonares con criterio oncológico es viable en un grupo seleccionado de pacientes, siendo las resecciones pulmonares menores (segmento y cuña) los procedimientos de preferencia. Las metástasis múltiples y/o bilaterales no son una contraindicación quirúrgica. El índice de sobrevida actuarial a 5 años fue mayor para los sarcomas (67%) que para los carcinomas (30%); el índice global fue de 41%. Ocho de los 9 sarcomas recibieron quimioterapía adyuvante. La sobrevida a 5 años en los pacientes con un intervalo libre tumoral de más de 36 meses fue del 59%contra 28%de aquellos con un intervalo libre menor de 36 meses. La mortalidad operatoria fue del 2,2