Megazol and its bioisostere 4H-1,2,4-triazole: comparing the trypanocidal, cytotoxic and genotoxic activities and their in vitro and in silico interactions with the Trypanosoma brucei nitroreductase enzyme

Megazol (7) is a 5-nitroimidazole that is highly active against Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei, as well as drug-resistant forms of trypanosomiasis. Compound 7 is not used clinically due to its mutagenic and genotoxic properties, but has been largely used as a lead compound. Here, we compared the activity of 7 with its 4H-1,2,4-triazole bioisostere (8) in bloodstream forms of T. brucei and T. cruzi and evaluated their activation by T. brucei type I nitroreductase (TbNTR) enzyme. We also analysed the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of these compounds in whole human blood using Comet and fluorescein diacetate/ethidium bromide assays. Although the only difference between 7 and 8 is the substitution of sulphur (in the thiadiazole in 7) for nitrogen (in the triazole in 8), the results indicated that 8 had poorer antiparasitic activity than 7 and was not genotoxic, whereas 7 presented this effect. The determination of Vmax indicated that although 8 was metabolised more rapidly than 7, it bounds to the TbNTR with better affinity, resulting in equivalent kcat/KM values. Docking assays of 7 and 8 performed within the active site of a homology model of the TbNTR indicating that 8 had greater affinity than 7.

Spinal Gabapentin and Antinociception: Mechanisms of Action

Spinal gabapentin has been known to show the antinociceptive effect. Although several assumptions have been suggested, mechanisms of action of gabapentin have not been clearly established. The present study was undertaken to examine the action mechanisms of gabapentin at the spinal level. Male SD rats were prepared for intrathecal catheterization. The effect of gabapentin was assessed in the formalin test. After pretreatment with many classes of drugs, changes of effect of gabapentin were examined. General behaviors were also observed. Intrathecal gabapentin produced a suppression of the phase 2 flinching, but not phase 1 in the formalin test. The antinociceptive action of intrathecal gabapentin was reversed by intrathecal NMDA, AMPA, D-serine, CGS 15943, atropine, and naloxone. No antagonism was seen following administration of bicuculline, saclofen, prazosin, yohimbine, mecamylamine, L-leucine, dihydroergocristine, or thapsigargin. Taken together, intrathecal gabapentin attenuated only the facilitated state. At the spinal level, NMDA receptor, AMPA receptor, nonstrychnine site of NMDA receptor, adenosine receptor, muscarinic receptor, and opioid receptor may be involved in the antinociception of gabapentin, but GABA receptor, L-amino acid transporter, adrenergic receptor, nicotinic receptor, serotonin receptor, or calcium may not be involved.