Vacunas anti-pertussis: acelular versus celular. ¿Acaso un regreso al pasado? / Pertussis vaccines: acellular versus whole cell. Perhaps a return to the past?

The resurgence of pertussis in the world and in our country has questioned the effectiveness of cellular and acellular vaccines. The reason why pertussis has not been controlled or eliminated after 70 years of implementation of the vaccination is probably multifactorial. This article, on the basis of questions and answers, describes the benefits and limitations of both cellular and acellular vaccines and suggests new strategies of vaccination in childhood. It is a fact that the currently applied vaccination does not eliminate the circulation of Bordetella pertussis in the community. Perhaps the introduction of vaccines with live B. pertussis, inhalation, will be able to eliminate the disease around the world.

El resurgimiento de la coqueluche en el mundo y en nuestro país ha puesto en tela de juicio la eficacia de las vacunas celulares y acelulares. Las razones de por qué la coqueluche no es controlada ni eliminada después de 70 años de implementación de la vacunación son diversas y probablemente multifactoriales. En este artículo, en base a preguntas y respuestas, se describen las bondades y limitaciones de tanto vacunas celulares como acelulares y queda sugerida una mejor forma de administrar ambas en la infancia. Es un hecho que la vacunación actualmente aplicada no elimina la circulación de Bordetella pertussis en la comunidad. Tal vez la introducción de vacunas con B. pertussis viva, inhalatoria, sea capaz de eliminar la enfermedad de la humanidad.

Evaluation of respiratory model employing conventional NIH mice to access the immunity induced by cellular and acellular pertussis vaccines

The increasing number of pertussis cases reported on the last twenty years and the existence of new acellular vaccines reinforce the need of research for experimental models to assure the quality of available pertussis vaccines. In this study, allotments of whole-cell and acellular pertussis vaccines were tested through the Intranasal Challenge Model (INM) using conventional NIH mice. The results have been compared to those achieved by the "Gold standard" Intracerebral Challenge Model (ICM). In contrast to ICM, INM results did not show intralaboratorial variations. Statistical analysis by Anova and Ancova tests revealed that the INM presented reproducibility and allowed identification and separation of different products, including three-component and four-component accellular pertussis vaccines. INM revealed differences between pertussis vaccines. INM provides lower distress to the mice allowing the reduction of mice number including the possibility of using conventional mice (less expensive) under non-aseptic environment. Thus, INM may be used as an alternative method of verifying the consistence of allotment production, including acellular pertussis vaccines.