Custos não médicos diretos e indiretos relacionados ao glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto no Brasil / Non-medical direct and indirect costs related to primary open-angle glaucoma in Brazil

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar os custos não médicos diretos e indiretos em uma população de pacientes portadores de glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto (GPAA) em tratamento no Brasil. Métodos: A pesquisa dos custos neste estudo transversal foi realizada através de entrevista a uma população de pacientes portadores de GPAA em acompanhamento em um centro de referência para o tratamento do glaucoma na cidade de Juiz de Fora - MG. Para avaliação dos custos não médicos diretos, as seguintes variáveis foram investigadas: gasto com transporte, hospedagem, alimentação e acompanhante para cada consulta. Já na análise dos custos indiretos, avaliou-se: recebimento ou não de benefício social por causa do glaucoma (aposentadoria ou auxílio-doença) e qual o valor anual e perda de dias trabalhados pelo paciente e/ou pelo acompanhante. Os valores médios anuais foram calculados para todo o grupo e para cada estágio evolutivo do glaucoma. Resultados: Setenta e sete pacientes foram incluídos nesta análise (GPAA inicial: 26,0%; GPAA moderado: 24,7% e GPAA avançado: 49,3%). A média do custo não médico direto foi (em reais): 587,47; 660,52 e 708,54 para os glaucomas iniciais, moderados e avançados, respectivamente. Já a média do custo indireto foi: 20.156,75 (GPAA inicial); 26.988,16 (moderado) e 27.263,82 (avançado). Conclusão: Os custos não médicos diretos e indiretos relacionados ao GPAA no Brasil foram identificados. Os custos indiretos são superiores aos custos não médicos diretos e ambos tendem a aumentar com o avanço da doença.

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify direct and indirect non-medical costs in a population of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) receiving treatment in Brazil. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we obtained the costs through an interview with a population of patients with POAG at a glaucoma referral clinic in the city of Juiz de Fora - MG. In order to assess the direct non-medical costs, we investigated the following variables transportation expenses, lodging expenses, food and companion expenses for each visit. In the indirect costs analysis, we assessed the following variables: whether or not social benefits were received because of glaucoma (retirement or sickness benefit) and the annual value and loss of days worked by the patient and/or the companion. We calculated the mean annual values for the whole group and for each glaucoma stage. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included in this analysis (initial POAG: 26.0%, moderate POAG: 24.7% and advanced POAG 49.3%). The mean non-medical direct cost was (in reais): 587.47; 660.52 and 708.54 for the initial, moderate and advanced glaucomas, respectively. The mean indirect cost was: 20,156.75 (initial POAG); 26,988.16 (moderate POAG) and 27,263.82 (advanced POAG). Conclusion: We identified the direct and indirect non-medical costs related to POAG in Brazil. Indirect costs are higher than non-medical direct costs and both tend to increase with disease progression.

The Effect of Outpatient Cost Sharing on Health Care Utilization of the Elderly / 예방의학회지

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of outpatient cost-sharing on health care utilization by the elderly. METHODS: The data in this analysis was the health insurance claims data between July 1999 and December 2008 (114 months). The study group was divided into two age groups, namely 60-64 years old and 65-69 years old. This study evaluated the impact of policy change on office visits, the office visits per person, and the percentage of the copayment-paid visits in total visits. Interrupted time series and segmented regression model were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The results showed that outpatient cost-sharing decreased office visits, but it also decreased the percentage of copayment-paid visits, implying that the intensity of care increased. There was little difference in the results between the two age groups. But after the introduction of the coinsurance system for those patients under age 65, office visits and the percentage of copayment-paid visits decreased, and the 60-64 years old group had a larger decrease than the 65-69 years old group. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluated the effects of outpatient cost-sharing on health care utilization by the aged. Cost sharing of the elderly had little effect on controlling health care utilization.

Pharmacoeconomics of antidepressants in moderate-to-severe depressive disorder in Colombia / Farmacoeconomía de antidepresivos en trastornos de depresión moderada e intensa en Colombia

OBJECTIVE: To compare three antidepressant drugs from different classes used in treating moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD) in Colombian adults. METHODS: Based on expert input, a decision-tree model was adapted for Colombia to analyze data over 6 months from the government-payer perspective. The cost-effectiveness of amitriptyline, fluoxetine, and venlafaxine was determined. The clinical outcome was remission of depression (a score <7 on the Hamilton Depression [HAM-D] scale or <12 on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) after 8 weeks of treatment. Clinical data were obtained from the literature and costs from standard Colombian price lists. One-way and multivariate sensitivity analyses tested model robustness. RESULTS: Costs per patient (in 2007 US$) for treatment were: venlafaxine, $1 618; fluoxetine, $1 207; and amitriptyline, $1 068. Overall remission rates were 73.1 percent, 64.1 percent, and 71.3 percent, respectively. Amitriptyline dominated fluoxetine (i.e., it had lower costs and higher outcomes). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of venlafaxine over amitriptyline was US$ 31 595. The acquisition price of venlafaxine was the model's cost driver, comprising 53.4 percent of the total cost/patient treated, compared with 18.5 percent and 24.8 percent for fluoxetine and amitriptyline, respectively. For the others, hospitalization comprised the major cost (72.1 percent and 65.2 percent, respectively). Probabilistic (Monte Carlo) sensitivity analysis confirmed the original findings of the pharmacoeconomic model. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline is cost-effective in comparison to fluoxetine and venlafaxine in Colombia. However, the cost of venlafaxine was estimated for the brand-name product, as generics were not currently available. These cost-effectiveness results can be substantially affected by the presence of generics or drug cost regulations.

OBJETIVO: Comparar tres medicamentos antidepresivos de diferentes clases empleados para tratar trastornos depresivos mayores moderados e intensos en adultos colombianos. MÉTODOS: A partir de los aportes de expertos se adaptó un modelo de árbol de decisión para Colombia a fin de analizar los datos de seis meses desde la perspectiva del gobierno como pagador de los servicios. Se determinó la relación costo-efectividad de la amitriptilina, la fluoxetina y la venlafaxina. El desenlace clínico fue la remisión de la depresión (una puntuación <7 en la escala de depresión de Hamilton o <12 en la escala de valoración de la depresión de Montgomery-Åsberg) después de 8 semanas de tratamiento. Los datos clínicos se obtuvieron de la literatura especializada y los costos, de las listas habituales de precios de Colombia. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad simples y multifactoriales para probar la robustez de los modelos. RESULTADOS: Los costos del tratamiento por paciente (en dólares estadounidenses de 2007) fueron: US$ 1 618 para la venlafaxina, US$ 1 207 para la fluoxetina y US$ 1 068 para la amitriptilina. Las tasas de remisión general fueron 73,1 por ciento, 64,1 por ciento y 71,3 por ciento, respectivamente. La amitriptilina tuvo un menor costo y una mayor remisión que la fluoxetina. La razón de rentabilidad incremental de la venlafaxina sobre la amitriptilina fue de US$ 31 595. El inductor de costos (cost driver) del modelo fue el valor de adquisición de la venlafaxina, que representó 53,4 por ciento del total del costo por paciente tratado, en comparación con la fluoxetina (18,5 por ciento) y la amitriptilina (24,8 por ciento). En los otros casos, la hospitalización representó el mayor costo (72,1 por ciento y 65,2 por ciento, respectivamente). El análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico (Monte Carlo) confirmó los resultados preliminares del modelo farmacoeconómico. CONCLUSIONES: En Colombia, la amitriptilina es más efectiva en función del...

Economic burden of varicella in Singapore--a cost benefit estimate of implementation of a routine varicella vaccination.

Varicella is a common childhood illness that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. As early as 1995, recommendations for routine varicella vaccination have been published, but have not been universally implemented, with cost of vaccination as a major reason. Though available from 1996, the vaccine has yet to be routinely implemented in Singapore. We set out to assess the economic burden of varicella and the cost-benefit of adding a varicella vaccine to the existing immunization schedule in Singapore. In this study, using data from 1994--1995 the direct cost estimates were based on all levels of medical care; inpatient care, emergency room visits, primary health care and medication. Indirect costs were estimated from the cost of time lost by patients and their families attending to medical needs, as well as loss of productivity due to absenteeism. The cost of a vaccination program targeted at 15-month old infants receiving concomitant measles-mumps-rubella immunization was also assessed. The cost-benefit ratio was then estimated. The total cost of varicella in Singapore was estimated to be US$11.8 million per annum. The loss of productivity accounted for a large proportion of the total cost as a lot of parents took leave when their children were ill. The estimates of total cost represent approximately US$188 per varicella case per year. In comparison, the cost of a vaccination program was found to be US$3.3 million per annum. The cost per case averted was US$104. From a societal point of view, for every dollar invested in a vaccination program, we would save about US$2 dollars.

Custo da conduta ambulatorial num Hospital Universitario, para os responsaveis dos pacientes pediatricos / Cost of an ambulatorial consultation at the University Hospital for responsible person of the pediatric patients

Estudo descritivo transversal, sendo os dados coletados atraves de questionarios aplicados aos responsaveis por criancas que procuram o ambulatorio de pediatria geral do Hospital Universitario(HU) da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina(UFSC).Os objetivos foram a verificacao da procedencia e o por que da procura dos responsaveis pelo ambulatorio, bem como dos gastos da consulta. Discutido o sistema de saude brasileiro e apresentacao de proposta para sua viabilizacao

Estudio socio-económico de los pacientes que acuden al triaje general de un hospital / Socio-economic study of patients that attend at the general triage of an hospital

La prevención es importante para reducir la carga de las enfermedades crónicas. La consulta externa y el triaje deben ser factor de enlace entre el paciente y el entorno socio-cultural-geográfico. Se estudian 188 pacientes del triaje general del Hospital Rísquez en Cotiza, Caracas, por medio de una encuesta socio-económica. El 66% de los pacientes eran solteros. El 72,34% eran del sexo femenino. El 87,77% eran venezolanos por nacimiento y el 9,03% extranjeros. El 15,43% no ha completado los estudios de primaria (hasta 6 grado). El 35,64% no ha completado la educación secundaria y el 9,04% eran analfabetos. El 58,57% no trabajaban. El 86,77% acuden al hospital por referencia de un amigo o familiar. El 65,43% refiere no tener vivienda propia y el 85,64% no tenía vehiculo propio. El grupo familiar, sin incluir al paciente, lo forman entre 2 a 5 personas en el 60,64% de los casos; y trabajan entre 1 y 3 personas en el 81,93%. El 20,69% de los pacientes provenían de zonas foráneas a Caracas