Pharmacological and Safety Profile of Dexlansoprazole: A New Proton Pump Inhibitor - Implications for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Asia Pacific Region

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease is not as common in Asia as in western countries, the prevalence has increased substantially during the past decade. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with considerable reductions in subjective well-being and work productivity, as well as increased healthcare use. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently the most effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, there are limitations associated with these drugs in terms of partial and non-response. Dexlansoprazole is the first PPI with a dual delayed release formulation designed to provide 2 separate releases of medication to extend the duration of effective plasma drug concentration. Dexlansoprazole has been shown to be effective for healing of erosive esophagitis, and to improve subjective well-being by controlling 24-hour symptoms. Dexlansoprazole has also been shown to achieve good plasma concentration regardless of administration with food, providing flexible dosing. Studies in healthy volunteers showed no clinically important effects on exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel or clopidogrel-induced platelet inhibition, with no dose adjustment of clopidogrel necessary when coprescribed. This review discusses the role of the new generation PPI, dexlansoprazole, in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia.

Molecular profile of colorectal cancer in Indonesia: is there another pathway?

Colorectal cancer is an emerging public health problem in Indonesia and currently ranks among the three highest cancers. Lack of a colonoscopy screening and lifestyle changes might contribute to it. In the last few decades, there is an increasing interest towards the contribution of genetic-environment interaction in colorectal carcinogenesis. Some studies have indicated that CRC might develop through several different pathways; the three major routes are chromosomal instability [CIN], microsatellite instability [MSI], and inflammatory pathways. An earlier study on clinical epidemiology of CRC in Indonesia showed that the majority of patients were diagnosed between 45 and 50 years old, with a mean age around 47 years old. Further studies showed that most young Indonesian cases of CRC do not have hereditary characteristics; however, the CRC did not follow the conventional pathways of sporadic CRC [the CIN] pathway. Rather, it is a mixed of MSI and inflammatory pathways. Immunohistochemical studies showed that the proportion of patients with negative mismatch repair proteins was 43.5% for MSH2 and 83.5% for MLH1. Along the sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis pathway, there was a specific role of cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2] enzyme during the polyp formation. COX-2 expression was reported in about 80% CRC cases worldwide. However, our study found only 49% of COX-2 expression among the CRC patients. Interestingly, an inflammatory marker, the nucleus factor [k]B [NF-[k]B], was expressed in about 73.5% cases, in line with a previous study. More recently, KRAS has been used as a potential tumor marker to select treatment and its expression was reported to be as high as 30%-40% worldwide. However, we found that KRAS gene expression was only 16.3%. Our findings support that CRC patients in Indonesian might follow a distinct pathway, a hypothesis that deserves further exploration