Orofacial manifestations of COVID-19: a brief review of the published literature

Abstract: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread exponentially across the world. The typical manifestations of COVID-19 include fever, dry cough, headache and fatigue. However, atypical presentations of COVID-19 are being increasingly reported. Recently, a number of studies have recognized various mucocutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19. This study sought to summarize the available literature and provide an overview of the potential orofacial manifestations of COVID-19. An online literature search in the PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted to retrieve the relevant studies published up to July 2020. Original studies published in English that reported orofacial manifestations in patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were included; this yielded 16 articles involving 25 COVID-19-positive patients. The results showed a marked heterogeneity in COVID-19-associated orofacial manifestations. The most common orofacial manifestations were ulcerative lesions, vesiculobullous/macular lesions, and acute sialadentitis of the parotid gland (parotitis). In four cases, oral manifestations were the first signs of COVID-19. In summary, COVID-19 may cause orofacial manifestations that might be the initial features in several cases. However, the occurrence of orofacial manifestations in COVID-19 seems to be underreported, mainly due to the lack of oral examination of patients with suspected and/or confirmed COVID-19. Oral examination of all suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases is crucial for better understanding and documenting COVID-19-associated orofacial manifestations.

Efeito de diferentes sistemas de obturação na resistência à fratura de raízes tratadas endodonticamente / The Influence of different obturation systems on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots

Objective: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled by different obturation systems. Material and methods: Ninety-six maxillary central incisors were used and decoronated, retaining 12 mm of the roots. On the basis of obturation systems, the roots were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=24): Group1 (COGR): control group (unprepared, unfilled), Group 2 (AVGR): ActiV GP points/ActiV GP sealer, Group 3 (GPGR): Gutta percha points / AH plus sealer, and Group4 (GAGR): Gutta percha points/ActiV GP sealer. The last three groups were obturated with the single cone technique. The roots were then stored in 100% relative humidity at 37 °C for 2 weeks. A vertical compressive force was exerted in a universal testing machine until fracture occurred. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results: Mean (SD) failure loads for groups ranged from 920.51 ± 210.37 to 1113.44 ± 489.42 N. The fracture resistance between the different study groups indicated no statistical difference (p>0.05). Conclusions: ActiV GP system did not exert a significant effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.(AU)

Objective: Comparar a resistência à fratura de raízes tratadas endodonticamente obturadas através de diferentes sistemas. Materiais e Métodos: Noventa e seis incisivos centrais superiores foram utilizados, tiveram as coroas removidas, restando 12 mm de raíz. De acordo com o sistema de obturação, as raízes foram divididas em 4 grupos (n=24): Grupo1 (COGR): grupo controle (sem preparo, sem preenchimento), Grupo2 (AVGR): cones ActiV GP / cimento ActiV GP, Grupo3 (GPGR): cones de guta percha / cimento AH plus, e Grupo4 (GAGR): cones de guta percha / cimento ActiV GP. Os últimos três grupos foram obturados através da técnica de cone único. As raízes foram armazenadas em 100% de umidade relativa a 37 °C durante 2 semanas. Uma força compressiva vertical foi aplicada através de uma máquina de ensaio universal até ocorrer fratura. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente através de ANOVA ­ 1 fator. Resultados: A carga média (SD) obtida no momento da falha variou entre 920.51 ± 210.37 até 1113.44 ± 489.42 N. A resistência à fratura entre os diferentes grupos estudados não indicaram diferença estatística. Conclusão: O sistema ActiV GP não exerceu um efeito significante na resistência à fratura em dentes tratados endodonticamente.(AU)