Valor prognóstico do Escore de Risco GRACE versus Escore de Risco TIMI em síndromes coronarianas agudas / Prognostic Value of GRACE Scores versus TIMI Score in acute coronary syndromes

FUNDAMENTO: Embora o Escore de Risco TIMI seja o mais utilizado em síndromes coronarianas agudas sem supradesnível do segmento ST (SCA), o Escore GRACE tem potencial superioridade prognóstica, pois foi criado a partir de um registro observacional, parte das variáveis são tratadas de forma semiquantitativa e a função renal é computada em seu cálculo. OBJETIVO: Testar a hipótese de que o Escore de Risco GRACE tem superior valor prognóstico hospitalar, comparado ao Escore TIMI em pacientes admitidos com SCA. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos indivíduos com angina instável ou infarto do miocárdio sem supradesnível do segmento ST, consecutivamente internados em unidade coronariana entre agosto de 2007 e janeiro de 2009. RESULTADOS: Foram estudados 154 pacientes, idade 71 ± 13 anos, 56 por cento do gênero feminino, mediana do GRACE de 117 e mediana do TIMI de 3. Durante o período de internamento, a incidência de eventos foi 8,4 por cento (12 óbitos e 1 infarto não fatal). O teste de Hosmer-Lemeshow aplicado ao Escore GRACE apresentou χ2 de 5,3 (P = 0,72), enquanto Escore TIMI apresentou χ2 de 1,85 (P = 0,60). Desta forma, ambos os escores apresentaram boa calibração. Quanto à análise de discriminação, o Escore GRACE apresentou estatística-C de 0,91 (95 por cento IC = 0,86 - 0,97), significativamente superior à estatística-C de 0,69 do Escore TIMI (95 por cento IC = 0,55 - 0,84) - P = 0,02 para diferença entre os escores. CONCLUSÃO: Em relação à predição de eventos hospitalares em pacientes com SCA, o Escore GRACE tem superior capacidade prognóstica quando comparado ao Escore TIMI.

BACKGROUND: Although the TIMI score is the one most frequently used in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without ST-segment elevation, the GRACE score has potential prognostic superiority, as it was created based on an observational registry, part of the variables is treated in a semi-quantitative form and renal function is taken into account in its calculation. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the GRACE risk score has superior in-hospital prognostic value, when compared to the TIMI score in patients admitted with ACS. METHODS: Individuals with unstable angina or myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, consecutively admitted at the Coronary Unit between August 2007 and January 2009, were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients aged 71 ± 13 years, of which 56 percent were females, with a GRACE median of 117 and a TIMI median of 3 were studied. During the hospitalization period, the incidence of events was 8.4 percent (12 deaths and 1 non-fatal infarction). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test applied to the GRACE score presented an χ2 of 5.3 (P = 0.72), whereas the TIMI score presented an χ2 of 1.85 (P = 0.60). Therefore, both scores presented good calibration. As for the analysis of discrimination, the GRACE score presented a C-statistics of 0.91 (95 percentCI= 0.86 - 0.97), significantly superior to the C-statistics of 0.69 of the TIMI score (95 percentCI = 0.55 - 0.84) - P = 0.02 for the difference between the scores. CONCLUSION: Regarding the prediction of hospital events in patients with ACS, the GRACE score has superior prognostic capacity when compared to the TIMI score.

Parasitismo de percevejos-praga do maracujazeiro no Brasil por Hexacladia smithii Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) / Parasitism of passion fruit bugs in Brazil by Hexacladia smithii Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)

We describe the new association of Hexacladia smithii (Ashmead) parasitizing two passion fruit bugs, Holhymenia histrio (Fabricius) and Anisoscelis foliacea marginella (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Coreidae), in Brazil.

Action of peracetic acid on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in suspension or settled on stainless steel surfaces

The efficiency of a commercial peracetic acid sanitizer on destruction of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli was evaluated using two distinct methods. The first method is the AOAC suspension test and the second is a method proposed by one of the authors in which the microbial cells are settled on a stainless steel surface and then treated with the sanitizer. The results showed that when in suspension S. aureus was more resistant to the sanitizer than E. coli. When S. aureus was settled on the stainless steel surface, the contact time between the sanitizer and the microorganisms to attain a 6.5 log reduction in the number of viable cells was three times greater than when the cells were in suspension.