Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(5): 683-689, Sept.-Oct. 2007. ilus, graf, tab
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-470219

Résumé

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study is to compare surgical complications and long-term survival in children with Wilms' tumor (WT) and tumor thrombus receiving or not preoperative chemotherapy MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of the charts of 155 children with WT treated between 1983 and 2005, and analysis of 16/155 (10.3 percent) children with WT who presented cavoatrial tumor extension, being 8/16 IVC and 8/16 atrial thrombus RESULTS: Median age was 54 months. 2/16 had cardiac failure as the first symptom. 11/16(7 IVC and 4 atrial extension) (67 percent) were submitted to preoperative chemotherapy with vincristine plus actinomycin D, and 5/16(1 IVC and 4 atrial) (33 percent) underwent initial nephrectomy and thrombus resection. So, 11 patients were submitted to preoperative VCR/ACTD and 2/11 (18.1 percent) had complete regression of the thrombus, 6/11(54.5 percent) partial regression and 3/11 (27 percent) had no response. Among the partial responders, nephrectomy with thrombus removal was performed in all, including one patient with previous intracardiac involvement, without extracorporeal circulation procedures. In two of the three non-responders, cardiopulmonary bypass was necessary for thrombus removal. There were no surgical related deaths. Long-term survival is 91 percent in the group submitted to preoperative chemotherapy and 100 percent in the group who had surgery as first approach CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy was able to reduce thrombus extension in 8/11 (73 percent) treated patients and cardiopulmonary bypass was avoided in 2 patients with atrial thrombus. Surgical resection of tumor and thrombus was successful in all cases, receiving or not preoperative chemotherapy and overall survival was similar in both groups.


Sujets)
Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Humains , Nourrisson , Mâle , Antinéoplasiques/administration et posologie , Dactinomycine/administration et posologie , Atrium du coeur/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du rein/traitement médicamenteux , Veine cave inférieure/anatomopathologie , Vincristine/administration et posologie , Tumeur de Wilms/traitement médicamenteux , Traitement médicamenteux adjuvant , Tumeurs du rein/mortalité , Tumeurs du rein/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du rein/chirurgie , Invasion tumorale , Stadification tumorale , Études rétrospectives , Analyse de survie , Facteurs temps , Tumeur de Wilms/mortalité , Tumeur de Wilms/anatomopathologie , Tumeur de Wilms/chirurgie
3.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 82(6): 481-484, Nov.-Dec. 2006. tab
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-440516

Résumé

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a história vacinal e a situação da proteção vacinal contra sarampo e rubéola em crianças portadoras de leucemia linfóide aguda após o término do tratamento. MÉTODOS: O estado imunológico contra o sarampo e a rubéola foi avaliado pela técnica ELISA em 22 crianças com leucemia linfóide aguda após o término do tratamento. RESULTADOS: Dos 22 pacientes, 20 haviam recebido previamente duas doses da vacina do sarampo, e 18 deles, uma dose da vacina da rubéola. Soropositivos para sarampo e rubéola resultaram em 65 e 88,9 por cento, respectivamente, sem correlação com idade do paciente, agressividade do tratamento ou tempo decorrido entre final do tratamento e coleta da amostra. CONCLUSÃO: Detectamos falha na proteção vacinal contra sarampo e rubéola em 35 e 11,1 por cento dos casos, respectivamente. Recomendamos, ao final do tratamento para leucemia linfóide aguda, aplicar reforço da vacina contra sarampo, avaliar o estado imunológico contra rubéola e, se necessário, revacinar o paciente.


OBJECTIVE: To assess the vaccination history and the status of vaccine-induced protection from measles and rubella in children after treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. METHODS: Measles and rubella immunological status was assessed by the ELISA technique for 22 children previously treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. RESULTS: From the total of 22 patients, 20 had been given two doses of measles vaccine and 18 had had one dose of rubella vaccine. The percentage of patients seropositive for measles and rubella were 65 and 88.9 percent, respectively, with no correlation with age of patient, aggression of treatment or the time passed between the end of treatment and sample collection. CONCLUSIONS: We detected that vaccination had failed against measles and rubella in 35 and 11.1 percent of cases, respectively. We recommend that a measles booster be given after the completion of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia and that rubella immunity status should be assessed at this point, with revaccination performed when necessary.


Sujets)
Humains , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Enfant , Adolescent , Tolérance immunitaire/immunologie , Vaccin contre la rougeole/immunologie , Leucémie-lymphome lymphoblastique à précurseurs B et T , Vaccin antirubéoleux/immunologie , Antinéoplasiques/effets indésirables , Antinéoplasiques/usage thérapeutique , Test ELISA , Calendrier vaccinal , Rougeole/prévention et contrôle , Leucémie-lymphome lymphoblastique à précurseurs B et T , Rubéole/prévention et contrôle , Statistique non paramétrique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche