Résumé
It is not clear whether the laparoscopic approach does decrease the incidence of postoperative infectious complications after appendectomy. One hundred twenty nine patients were randomized, 67 with laparoscopic [LA] and 62 with open appendectomy [OA]. Patients in the OA group had a Mc Burney incision, LA was performed in the Lithotomy position. Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 85 percent of patients. The appendix was perforated in 5 patients of the LA versus 2 of the OA group. No conversion to the open procedure was necessary. The median operating time was 35 minutes in the LA group and 31 minutes in the open group [P=0.58]. The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter after Laparoscopic than after open surgery [2 days versus 5 days P= 0.026], where as the time required for return to work was not significantly different [14 versus 15 days]. There were 5 [7.4 percent] patients with superficial wound infection following LA and 6 [9.6 percent] after OA [P=0.67]. Intra-abdominal fluid collections were found in 2 [2.9 percent] patients following LA and 3 [4.8 percent] patients following OA [P =0.60]. In the LA group, 3 patients presented with intra abdominal hemorrhage and another 3 developed a paralytic ileus that was treated conservatively. Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe as and as effective as the open procedure, however it does not decrease the rate of postoperative infectious complications