Résumé
BACKGROUND: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) has become increasingly important as a means of ensuring patient comfort, safety and satisfaction during surgery under local anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of monitored anesthesia care using alfentanil and ketorolac in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). METHODS: We studied 47 adult patients premedicated with glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg and midazolam 0.02 mg/kg IV. Using a 5.0 endotracheal tube, 5 L/min of oxygen was delivered via mouth. A mixture of 30 mg of ketorolac and 2,500microgram of alfentanil in 25 ml of saline was infused to patients at a rate of 1microgram/kg/min alfentanil after a bolus injection of 5microgram/kg alfentanil before operation. During operations we monitered vital signs, SpO2, OAA/S (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation) scale and BIS scores. Six hours postoperatively we assessed patient degree of satisfaction via NRS (1-10) with the anesthetic technique and side effects. RESULTS: Mean duration of drug infusion was 35 +/- 10.1 min, and the mean infusion rate of alfentanil was 1.09 +/- 0.23microgram/kg/min. Significant differences were observed between OAA/S scale scores at 10 min and 30 min after drug infusion and those in the waiting room (4.63, 4.65 vs 5, P <0.05)(Fig. 4). The mean patient satisfaction score was 8.3 out of 10, and 93.6% (44/47) of patients said they would recommend this anesthetic technique to others for ESS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MAC using a mixture of alfentanil and ketorolac during ESS is a good way of relieving patient anxiety and pain without respiratory depression or excessive sedation. This study also showed a high level of patient satisfaction for those undergoing ESS under local anesthesia.
Sujets)
Adulte , Humains , Alfentanil , Anesthésie , Anesthésie locale , Anxiété , Glycopyrronium , Kétorolac , Midazolam , Bouche , Oxygène , Satisfaction des patients , Insuffisance respiratoire , Signes vitauxRésumé
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may produce lung injury with decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio in patients undergoing CABG surgery. We examined PaO2/FiO2 ratio and incidence of PaO2/FiO2 < 300 or 150 to determine the differences in oxygenation with the use of amrinone-dopamine (DP) or isosorbide dinitrate (IDN)-DP in patients undergoing CABG. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing elective CABG were divided into two groups according to drug used on separation from CPB: IDN-DP (Group 1, n = 10) or amrinone-DP (Group 2, n = 10). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, fentanyl and vecuronium. IDN infusion (1.0microgram/kg/min) was started preoperatively in both groups. Mild hypothermic CPB was applied with a roller pump and nonpulsatile flow maintained a mean arterial pressure of 60-80 mmHg. In Group 2, amrinone was administered (0.75 mg/kg + 10microgram/kg/min) instead of IDN at the time of CPB separation. DP infusion (3microgram/kg/min) was started at a rectal temperature more than 35.5oC and adjusted to maintain acceptable hemodynamics. IDN-DP or amrinone-DP infusion, monitoring and sedation with propofol were continued in the intensive care unit (ICU). PaO2/FiO2 ratio under controlled ventilation with air/O2 mixture (FiO2 0.6) was checked immediately before CPB (pre-CPB), 30 mins (post-CPB30), 60 mins after CPB (post-CPB60) and 30 mins after admission to ICU (ICU30). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the terms of the duration of arotic cross clamp, PaO2/FiO2 at pre-CPB, PaO2/FiO2 at post-CPB60, PaO2/FiO2 at ICU30 or in the incidence of PaO2/FiO2 < 150, PaO2/FiO2 < 300 at ICU30. But there was a significant difference in PaO2/FiO2 post CPB30 (263.3 +/- 105.5 in Group 1 vs. 381.7 +/- 69.5 in Group 2, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Amrinone-DP provides more favorable oxygenation immediately after CPB in CABG surgery than IDN-DP.