Clinical and Prognostic analysis of 43 Children with Mature B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma/Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia / 中国实验血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the clinical and prognostic features as well as treatment response of childhood B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma/acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-NHL/B-ALL), so as to better modify the treatment for further improving the prognosis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 43 patients with newly-diagnosed childhood B-NHL/B-ALL from July 2005 to December 2013 in West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed with particular focus on clinical presentations, laboratory findings and histology. Among them 26 patients received B-NHL-2010 protocol and 17 patients received LMB-89 protocol treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival rates between groups, while multiple factor logistic regression was used to identify the prognostic factors.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>(1) The median age at diagnosis was 7.58 (2.42-13.67) years. The male-to-female ratio was 2.9 : 1. No significant difference was found in the median age at diagnosis between male and female children with B-NHL/B-ALL (P = 0.837). (2) Burkitt's lymphoma was the most common (34/43, 79.07%), followed by diffuse large B cell lymphoma (4/43, 9.3%), ALL-L3 (3/43, 6.98%) and others (2/43, 4.65%) in decreasing frequency. (3) According to St. Jude staging classification, 4 patients (9.30%) were divided into stage I, 9 patients (20.93%) into stage II, 23 patients (53.49%) into stage III and 7 patients (16.28%) into stage IV; (4) Clinically, the common predilection sites were as following: ileocecus (11/43, 25.58%), nasopharynx (10/43, 23.26%), faciomaxillary (9/43, 20.93%), superficial lymphadenopathy (8/43, 18.60%), other sites such as mediastinum and bone marrow (5/43, 11.63%). (5) With a median follow up of 24 months (0.7-105 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and event-free survival (EFS) rate were 79.8% ± 6.5%% and 71.0% ± 7.2%, respectively. The 2-year OS and EFS rates in patients treated with B-NHL-2010 protocol were 79.1% ± 8.4% and 74.1% ± 8.4%, while those in patients treated with LMB-89 protocol were 87.5% ± 8.3% and 66.7% ± 12.4%, respectively, but there was no significant difference between them (P > 0.05). The 2-year EFS rate in patients with LDH > 2N and bone marrow infiltration were significantly lower than that of other groups (P < 0.05). (6) 8 patients (18.6%) relapsed. The median relapsed time was 6 months (2-9 months). 1 patient suffered progressive disease. Male, systemic symptom, elevated LDH, bone marrow and CNS infiltration and advanced stage (stage III and stage IV) were associated with relapse /progressive disease. Logistic regression analysis showed that LDH > 2N was an independent unfavorable prognostic factors (OR = 31.129, P = 0.02).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Outcome of B-NHL/B-ALL is greatly improved by current intensive and short-time chemotherapy regimen. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate is 71.0% ± 7.2%. There is no significant difference in EFS rate between patients treated with B-NHL-2010 protocol and LMB89 protocol. The long-term survival rate in patient with advanced disease need to be further improved.</p>

Blockage of mTOR signaling pathway by rapamycin contributes to inhibition of tumor cell proliferation in ALK-positive lymphoid cell strains / 中华血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the relationship between mTOR signaling pathway and ALK-positive lymphoid cell lines.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The expression of the downstream effector proteins of mTOR were analyzed by Western blot before and after Karpas299, BaF3/NPM-ALK and BaF3 cell lines treated with rapamycin. Effect of rapamycin on cell proliferation was detected by MTT assay. FACS was used to analyze apoptosis and cell cycles.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>mTOR signaling phosphoproteins, p-p70S6K and p-4E-BP1 were highly expressed in ALK(+) Karpas299, BaF3/NPM-ALK and parental BaF3 cell lines, and they were dephosphorylated after 1 h withdrawal of IL-3 in BaF3 cells. After 48 h exposure to 10 nmol/L rapamycin, p-p70S6K and p-4E-BP1 proteins expression were decreased, and mainly for the former. The relative inhibitory rate to its control cells was 24.4% in Karpas299, 37.8% in BaF3/NPM-ALK and 61.6% in BaF3. The apoptotic ratio was increased from (11.97 +/- 0.11)% to (15.87 +/- 0.62)% in Karpas299 (P < 0.05), from (3.23 +/- 0.11)% to (7.67 +/- 0.49)% in BaF3 (P < 0.05) and from (1.90 +/- 0.47)% to (2.80 +/- 0.27)% in BaF3/NPM-ALK (P > 0.05). The fraction of G(1) phase cells increased from (37.63 +/- 1.91)% to (69.77 +/- 5.44)% in BaF3/NPM-ALK, from (31.13 +/- 2.51)% to (40.70 +/- 1.47)% in Karpas299 and (53.57 +/- 2.22)% to (63.70 +/- 1.20)% in BaF3 (P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>NPM-ALK kinase can activate mTOR signaling pathway. Rapamycin can inhibit the proliferation of ALK(+) lymphoid cells by blocking mTOR signaling pathway and inducing cell cycling arrest at G(1) phase.</p>

Erythropoietin increases transferrin receptor expression and the impact of erythropoietin on K562 leukemic cell cycle / 中华儿科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Functionally, erythropoietin (EPO) can promote the proliferation and growth of erythroid progenitor cells, and it is widely used in the treatment of anemia in chronic diseases caused by tumor and inflammation. However, it is unclear whether EPO has any effect on tumor cell iron metabolism and tumor cell proliferation. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) on the expression of transferrin receptor (TfR, CD(71) antigen) of leukemic cell K562 and its relation to cell cycle.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>In vitro culture of K562 cell was performed with additions of various concentrations of rhEPO and Fe. Treatments were terminated at 24 h and 72 h, respectively. Then each group of cells was incubated with FITC-IgG antibody to CD(71) or PI, a kind of DNA dye. And TfR expression and DNA synthesis status were analyzed by flow-cytometry.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>(1) The expression of TfR by K562 cells increased significantly when incubated for 72 h with different concentrations of rhEPO. The measurement values of 5 U/ml, 10 U/ml and 20 U/ml groups were 12.2 +/- 1.40, 10.7 +/- 0.99 and 11.1 +/- 0.90, respectively. They were markedly increased when compared with that of control group (6.27 +/- 0.11, P < 0.05). (2) When incubated with rhEPO (5 u/ml) alone or combined with FeCl(3) (100 micro mol/L), the percentages of cells in S phase were 51.1% and 59.6%, respectively. They significantly increased when compared with that of control group (42.9%, P < 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Iron is very important for the proliferation of both normal cells and leukemic cells. It is essential to the activity of ribonucleotide reductase (RR). The authors hypothesized that rhEPO would increase the expression of TfR and intracellular iron content of leukemic cells, which would enhance the DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. Therefore, the clinical application of rhEPO to promote erythropoiesis of cancer patients should be cautious.</p>

Effect of T3 on the expression of transferrin receptor and ferritin in K562 cells and its possible mechanism / 中华血液学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the effect of T(3) on the expression of transferrin receptor (TfR) and ferritin (Fn) in K562 cells and its possible mechanism.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Flow cytometry was used for the detection of TfR expression, radioimmunoassay for Fn expression, RNA/protein band shift assay for the binding activity of iron regulatory protein (IRP) and iron responsive elements (IRE), and RT-PCR for TfR and Fn mRNA levels.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Different concentration of T(3) significantly increased Fn expression of K562 cells, especially at 100 nmol/L and 200 nmol/L (p < 0.05). However, T(3) had no effect on TfR expression. T(3) decreased the binding activity between IRP and IRE, particularly at concentration of 50 nmol/L. Different concentration of T(3) increased Fn-H mRNA level at different time point while it had no effect on TfR mRNA level.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>T(3) increased Fn expression of K562 cells through the possible mechanisms of either the post-transcriptional regulation or transcriptional modulation.</p>