Quando interromper, na sala de emergência, as manobras de ressuscitação cardiopulmonar na parada cardiorrespiratória sem atendimento pré-hospitalar? / When Should we Stop Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients Brought to the Emergency Room in Cardiac Arrest with no Out-ofHospital Care

PURPOSE: The decision of stopping cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients brought to emergency room in arrest remains a challenge. Such decision is even more difficult when someone is brought by bystanders, after an acute loss of consciousness without any out-of-hospital care. To evaluate the probability of survival of these patients we reviewed retrospectively charts in our institution, during a period of five years. METHODS: One hundred and one patients that fulfilled these characteristics came to our emergency in arrest. The time to arrival since symptoms started, cardiac rhythm at first electrocardiogram (EKG), age, gender, initial CPR success, late outcomes and previous diseases were obtained. Patients were divided in two groups regarding which cardiac rhythms they had at first EKG: A-patients arriving in asystole; and VF-patients arriving in ventricular fibrillation. To evaluate time to arrival, we arbitrarily choose 15 min as a reference point. RESULTS: In these 101 subjects the mean age was 62 +/- 13.7 years and 63 (62.3) were men. Previous heart disease was documented in 74 [dilated cardiomyopathy in 22 (21.7), coronary heart disease in 41 (40.6), arterial hypertension in 25 (24.7) and others in 6 (5.6)]. In 66 episodes we were sure of the time patients spent before arrival (mean 2.5 +/- 11 min). Only in 63 subjects we had no doubts about the rhythm at entrance: VF in 37 (58.7), A in 22 (34.9) and an accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIR) in four (6.3). Time to arrival was 18.6 +/- 10.6 in VF vs 32.5 +/- 11.7 min in A (p = 0.012). Fourteen (13.8) subjects resumed a supraventricular rhythm with systolic pressure > or = 90 mmHg after CPR and all of them were in VF (13) or AIR (one). Nine patients (8.9) evolved in coma. Only five (4.9) were discharged from the hospital without any neurological disturbance and their time to arrival ranged from one to 15 (9 +/- 5.8) min. CONCLUSION: Delayed arrival to the emergency room (> 15 min) associated with asystole were predictors of unsuccessful CPR, and both data are helpful in deciding when to stop CPR in subjects arriving at the emergency department with no out-of-hospital care.

Objetivo - Avaliar a chance de sobrevivência dos pacientes trazidos à emergência em parada cardiorrespiratória, sem atendimento pré-hospitalar, situação de difícil decisão quanto a se interromper as manobras de ressuscitação cardiopulmonar (RCP). Métodos - Retrospectivamente, analisamos os prontuários de 101 indivíduos trazidos à emergência em parada cardiorrespiratória (PCR) de janeiro/89 a dezembro/93. Avaliamos o tempo em minutos do início do sintomas até a chegada, o ritmo cardíaco ao eletrocardiograma (ECG), idade, sexo, taxa de sucesso inicial da RCP, evolução tardia e doenças pregressas. Dividimos os pacientes em 2 grupos, de acordo com o ritmo inicial: A - assistolia e FV -fibrilação ventricular. Na avaliação do tempo de chegada, consideramos arbitrariamente 15min como referência.Para avaliar diferenças entre os grupos realizamos os testes de Student e do X2 Resultados - A idade média foi de 62±13,7 anos e 63 (62,3%) eram homens. Pôde-se confirmar a existência de doença prévia em 74 casos [cardiomiopatia dilatada em 22 (21,7%), doença coronária em 41 (40,6%), hipertensão arterial em 25 (24,7%) e outras em seis (5,6%)]. Em 66 episódios tivemos certeza do tempo decorrido até a chegada à emergência (média de 22,5± 11 min.). Em 63 casos tivemos certeza do ritmo de chegada: FV em 37 (58,7%), A em 22 (34,9%) e ritmo idioventricular acelerado em quatro (6,3%). O tempo para a chegada foi de 18,6±10,6 no grupo FV vs 32,5±11,7min. no grupo A (p= 0,012). Quatorze (13,8%) indivíduos, nenhum do grupo A, reassumiram ritmo supraventricular com pressão arterial sistólica>90mmHg após a RCP. Desses, nove (8,9%) evoluíram em coma e somente cinco (4,9%) tiveram alta hospitalar, todos sem distúrbios neurológicos e do grupo FV. O tempo de chegada nesses cinco sobreviventes variou de 1 a 15 (9±5,8)min.Conclusão - Um tempo de chegada >15min associado a assistolia pode ajudar na decisão de se terminar os esforços de RCP em indivíduos que chegam à emergência sem atendimento pré-hospitalar

Uso da hidralazina intravenosa para o tratamento da crise hipertensiva / Use of intravenous hydralazine in treatment of hypertensive crisis

Purpose­To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous hidralazine in arterial hypertension. Patients and Methods­12 patients, meanage 45,33 15,82,8 men and 4 women all of them with systolic (S) arterialpressure (AP) 180 and or diastolic (D) 126 mmHg with symptoms like headache, incaracteristic toraxic pain and others but without an hypertensive emergency neither acute manifestation of hypertensive encephalopathy through fundi examination were studied. The AP was taked 10 minutes after rest (inicial) and 5, 15, 30 and 60 min (final) after intravenous administration of hidralazine-HCL (5mg) which was repeated when at least 20% AP reduction was not achieved. Results­ The inicial and final SAP, DAPand heart rate (HR) wre 208 ± 19,4 and 176 ± 17,2 (p < 0.0001), 133 ± 11,3 and 112 ± 11,5 (p< 0.001) and 72 ± 12,9 and 80 ± 15,5 (NS), respectively. Side effects related to the drug were observed in 3 (25%) patients. One had symptomatic ortostatic hypotension, the second had precordial pain with ST-T changes compatible with myocardial ischemia and the third presented a torax and abdominal cutaneous erithema, but all of them reversible. Conclusion­ Intravenous hydralazineHC1 is an alternative when rapid arterial pressurereduction is needed