Association between Morphodynamic Variables by Transesophageal Echocardiography and CHA2DS2-Vasc Values

In atrial fibrillation (AF), the CHA2DS2-VASc score calculates the risk for stroke. Di Biase classified the left atrial appendage (LAA), using magnetic resonance imaging, into 4 morphological types and correlated it with cerebrovascular events. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) also evaluates LAA and is a more widespread technique. Objective: To evaluate, using TEE, the possibility of characterizing LAA and to analyze its morphological aspects using the CHA2DS2VASc score. Methodology: A total of 247 patients were divided into three groups considering the CHA2DS2-VASc score: Group 1: 0 and 1; Group 2: 2 and 3 and, Group 3: ≥ 4 points. TEE produced the echocardiographic data. LAA was classified into thrombogenic and non-thrombogenic morphologies. In the analysis of statistical tests, a significance level of 5% was adopted. Results: The average age was 50 and 16.2% presented AF. In Group 1, we observed normal variables with a lower prevalence of AF (8.7%, p < 0.001). In group 2, spontaneous contrast was detected in 26.7%, (p < 0.001), thrombus in 6.7% (p = 0.079) and flow velocity in LAA < 0.4 m/s in 22.7% (p < 0.001) of the cases. Group 3 presented the highest percentages of AF (31.8%, p < 0.001), stroke/TIA (77.3%, p < 0.001), EF < 55% (18.2%, p = 0.010) and higher prevalence of thrombogenic type LAA (72.7%, p = 0.014). A higher occurrence of stroke/TIA was observed in patients with thrombogenic LAA (25.2%) compared to the non-thrombogenic group (11.2%), (p = 0.005). Conclusions: The thrombogenic morphology of LAA identified in TEE presented a higher risk of stroke regardless of the CHA2DS2VASc score. Patients with higher scores had greater abnormalities in echocardiographic variables

Comparação entre Técnicas de Block-Matching e Optical Flow na análise do Strain pela Ecocardiografia / Comparison of Block-Matching and Optical Flow in Strain Echocardiography Analysis

Introdução: Diferentes tecnologias têm sido utilizadas para avaliar a função sistólica do ventrículo esquerdo. De particular interesse, está a ecocardiografia com strain bidimensional (2DSTE). Dois métodos diferentes têm sido usados para quantificar a deformação miocárdica (strain miocárdico) pela 2DSTE: block matching e optical flow. Ambos estão presentes em ecocardiógrafos comercialmente disponíveis. Entretanto, não há consenso a respeito se as medidas do strain longitudinal por estes métodos são sobreponíveis. Objetivo: Comparar os valores de pico do strain miocárdico longitudinal obtidos através da 2DSTE pelos dois diferentes métodos (block matching x optical flow). Método: Foram realizadas as medidas do strain em 16 segmentos miocárdicos do ventrículo esquerdo, conforme orientação da Sociedade Americana de Ecocardiografia pela técnica do block matching (Vivid 7, GE, Horten, Noruega) e, imediatamente após, pela técnica do optical flow (My Lab 60, Esaote, Florença, Itália) de forma randomizada e seus valores foram comparados. Resultados: Houve 28 indivíduos com idade 27,9 ± 7,7 anos, sendo 50% do sexo masculino e todos com fração de ejeção superior a 55%. A medida do strain longitudinal global foi maior pela técnica de block matching (p = 0,02). Na análise dos 16 segmentos, houve 10 segmentos com valores diferentes, em especial os segmentos apicais. Conclusão: Os valores do strain miocárdico longitudinal obtidos por métodos diferentes não são sobreponíveis e devem ser usados com cautela. Sendo assim, valores de normalidade também variam de acordo com o fabricante e o método utilizado

Introduction: Different technologies have been used to evaluate left ventricular systolic function. Of particular interest is the two-dimensional strain echocardiography (2DSTE). Two different methods have been used to quantify myocardial strain by 2DSTE: block matching and optical flow. Both are present in commercially available echocardiographs. However, there is no consensus as to whether the longitudinal strain measures using these methods are overlapping. Objective: To compare the longitudinal myocardial strain peak values obtained through 2DSTE using two different methods (block matching x optical flow). Method: Strain measurements in 16 left ventricular myocardial segments were taken as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography using block matching (Vivid 7, GE, Horten, Norway) and, immediately after, using optical flow (My Lab 60, Esaote, Florence, Italy) in a randomized way and their values were compared. Results: There were 28 individuals aged 27.9 ± 7.7, of whom 50% were male and all with an ejection fraction greater than 55%. Global longitudinal strain was higher using block matching (p = 0.02). In the analysis of the 16 segments, 10 segments had different values, especially the apical segments. Conclusion: Longitudinal myocardial strain values obtained by different methods are not overlapping and must be used with caution. Normality values also vary according to the manufacturer and the method used