Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology ; : 421-424, 2014.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-114078

Résumé

We present a 17-year-old man who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging and laboratory exams for uncontrolled seizure. Patients with an autistic disorder require deep sedation or, occasionally, general anesthesia even for radiologic exams or simple procedures. The anesthetic management of an obese, violent patient with a severe autistic disorder and mental retardation can be challenging to anesthesiologists and requires a more careful approach in selecting adequate anesthetics and doses. This case emphasizes the importance of having a detailed plan to ensure the smooth process of premedication, anesthetic induction, maintenance, emergence and safe discharge of incorporated patients in the event of unexpected situations. A 5% lidocaine patch to relieve the pain from the intramuscular injection and intravenous cannulation, intramuscular midazolam as premedication, and propofol for the maintenance of sedation can be a good sedation protocol in incorporated patients.


Sujets)
Adolescent , Animaux , Humains , Anesthésie générale , Anesthésiques , Trouble autistique , Encéphale , Cathétérisme , Crêtes et barbillon , Sédation profonde , Injections musculaires , Déficience intellectuelle , Lidocaïne , Imagerie par résonance magnétique , Midazolam , Obésité , Prémédication , Propofol , Crises épileptiques
2.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 649-653, 2012.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-22415

Résumé

PURPOSE: Pain in terminal cancer patients may be refractory to systemic analgesics or associated with adverse drug reactions to analgesics. Epidural analgesia has been effectively used in such patients for pain control. However, this method does not provide pain relief to all patients. The efficacy and complications of continuous epidural analgesia were evaluated for expanding efficacy in terminal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of patients who received epidural analgesia for over 5 years for the control of terminal cancer pain were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients received 127 epidural catheters. The mean duration for epidural catheterization was 31.5+/-55.6 (5-509) days. The dose of epidural morphine increased by 3.5% per day. The efficacy of epidural analgesia at 2 weeks follow up revealed improved pain control (n=56), as the morphine equivalent drug dose dropped from 213.4 mg/day to 94.1 mg/day (p<0.05) at 2 weeks follow up. Accordingly, after 2 weeks institution of epidural analgesia, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with severe pain, from 78.1% to 19.6% (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was an effective pain control method in patients with terminal cancer pain, however, a systematized algorithm for the control of cancer-related pain in needed.


Sujets)
Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analgésie péridurale/méthodes , Bupivacaïne/usage thérapeutique , Morphine/usage thérapeutique , Tumeurs/physiopathologie , Douleur/traitement médicamenteux , Études rétrospectives
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche