Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 270-276, 2015.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-228879

Résumé

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the color changes of a resin composite with different shades upon exposure to water with different pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nanohybrid resin composites (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE) with four different shades (A2, A3, B1, and B2) were immersed in water with three different pH (pH 3, 6, and 9) for 14 day. The CIE L*a*b* color coordinates of the specimens were evaluated before and after immersion in the solutions. The color difference (DeltaE*) and the translucency parameter (TP) were calculated using the color coordinates. RESULTS: DeltaE* ranged from 0.33 to 1.58, and the values were affected significantly by the pH. The specimens immersed in a pH 6 solution showed the highest DeltaE* values (0.87 - 1.58). The specimens with a B1 shade showed the lowest DeltaE* change compared to the other shades. TP ranged from 7.01 to 9.46 depending on the pH and resin shade. The TP difference between before and after immersion in the pH solutions was less than 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting change of color of the tested specimens did not appear to be clinically problematic because the color difference was < 1.6 in the acidic, neutral, and alkaline solutions regardless of the resin shade, i.e., the color change was imperceptible.


Sujets)
Résines composites , Concentration en ions d'hydrogène , Immersion , Eau
2.
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry ; : 125-132, 2008.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-105059

Résumé

The purpose of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of repaired composite resin with different bonding agents and evaluate the effect of bonding agents on composite repair strength. Forty composite specimens (Z-250) were prepared and aged for 1week by thermocycling between 5 and 55degrees C with a dwell time of 30s. After air abrasion with 50 microm aluminum oxide, following different bonding agents were applied (n = 10); SB group: Scotchbond multipurpose adhesive (3 step Total-Etch system); SE group: Clearfil SE bond (2 step Self-Etch system); XP group: XP bond (2 step Total-Etch system); XE group: XenoIII (1 step Self-Etch system). After bonding procedure was completed, new composite resin (Z-250) was applied to the mold and cured. For control group, 10 specimens were prepared. Seven days after repair, shear bond strength was measured. Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). The means and standard deviations of shear bond strength (MPa +/- S.D.) per group were as follows: SB group: 17.06; SE group: 19.10; XP group: 14.44; XE group: 13.57; Control Group: 19.40. No significant difference found in each group. Within the limit of this study, it was concluded that the different type of bonding system was not affect on the shear bond strength of repaired composite resin.


Sujets)
Sujet âgé , Humains , Adhésifs , Oxyde d'aluminium , Champignons , Céments résine
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche