Résumé
Objective:To explore the value of panoramic teaching in clinical practice teaching of department of respiratory medicine.Methods:A total of 35 clinical interns who had a 3-week rotation in the department of respiratory medicine from October 2019 to June 2020 were selected, and they were divided into a control group ( n=17) and a study group ( n=18) according to the order of admission. The control group used traditional teaching, and the research group used panoramic teaching. After the teaching, the teaching effect was evaluated through theoretical knowledge assessment, practical assessment and questionnaire survey. SPSS 19.0 was used for t test. Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of interns in theoretical assessment [(89.62±4.05) points vs. (90.84±4.12) points, t=-0.891, P=0.379]. The results of practice assessment (case analysis, physical examination of the department, medical history inquiry and skills manipulation) of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group ( P<0.05). The interns in study group were better than those in control group in such aspects as learning interest, self-learning ability, self-study ability, doctor-patient communication language expression ability, literature review ability, clinical thinking ability, comprehensive analysis ability, knowledge development ability, system diagnosis ability, teamwork ability and teaching satisfaction ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Panoramic teaching can effectively improve the ability of interns to master the clinical diagnosis and treatment of respiratory medicine, improve the teaching effect, and improve the learning ability and clinical competence of interns in the future.