Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 46(4): 632-639, 2020. tab
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: biblio-1134196

Résumé

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative complications involving artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on rates of explantation and continence as well as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Materials and methods Inclusion criteria encompassed non-neurogenic, moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) post radical prostatectomy and primary implantation of an AUS performed by a high-volume surgeon (>100 previous implantations). Reporting complications followed the validated Clavien-Dindo scale and Martin criteria. HRQOL was assessed by the validated IQOL score, continence by the validated ICIQ-SF score. Statistical analysis included Chi (2) test, Mann-Whitney-U test, and multivariate regression models (p <0.05). Results 105 patients from 5 centers met the inclusion criteria. After a median follow-up of 38 months, explantation rates were 27.6% with a continence rate of 48.4%. In the age-adjusted multivariate analysis, perioperative urinary tract infection was confirmed as an independent predictor of postoperative explantation rates [OR 24.28, 95% CI 2.81-209.77, p=0.004). Salvage implantation (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.02-0.67, p=0.016) and non-prostatectomy related incontinence (OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.02-0.74, p=0.023) were independent predictors for worse continence outcomes. Low visual analogue scale scores (OR 9.999, 95% CI 1,42-70.25, p=0.021) and ICIQ-SF scores, respectively (OR 0.674, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, p=0.004) were independent predictors for increased HRQOL outcomes. Perioperative complications did not significantly impact on continence and HRQOL outcomes. Conclusion Findings show postoperative infections adversely affect device survival after AUS implantation. However, if explantation can be avoided, the comparative long-term functional results and HRQOL outcomes are similar between patients with or without perioperative complications.


Sujets)
Humains , Mâle , Sujet âgé , Incontinence urinaire d'effort/chirurgie , Incontinence urinaire d'effort/étiologie , Sphincter urinaire artificiel , Prostatectomie/effets indésirables , Qualité de vie , Résultat thérapeutique , Adulte d'âge moyen
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(3): 486-495, May-June 2015. tab, ilus
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-755865

Résumé

ABSTRACTPurpose:

In patients with penile cancer (PeCa) and increased risk of inguinal lymphatic dissemination, inguinal lymphadenectomy offers a direct histological staging as the most reliable tool for assessment of the nodal metastasic status and a definitive oncologic treatment simultaneously. However, peri- and/or postoperative mutilating sequalae often occurn. We report on clinical outcome and complications of a limited inguinal lymph node (LN) dissection.

Materials and Methods:

Clinical and histopathological data of all patients with PeCa who underwent limited inguinal lymphadenectomy (LIL) at our institution between 1986 and 2012 were comprehensively analyzed. Perioperative results were presented in relation to one-sided procedures, if appropriate, which were assessed without cross comparison with contralateral LILs.

Results:

29 consecutive patients with PeCa aged 60±10.3 years were included in the current study with 57 one-sided LIL performed. Mean operative time for one-sided LIL was 89.0±37.3 minutes with 8.1±3.7 LNs removed. A complication rate of 54.4% (n=31), including 16 minor and 15 major complications was found in a total of 57 procedures with leg oedema being the most prevalent morbidity (15.8%). 4 patients with clinically positive LNs developed inguinal lymphatic recurrence within 9 months after surgery.

Conclusions:

Our technique of limited inguinal LN dissection provided an acceptable complication rate without aggravating morbidity. We experienced no recurrences in clinically LN negative patients, so that the approach might be a reasonable option in this scenario. In patients with enlarged LNs, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy still appears to represent the gold standard.

.


Sujets)
Adulte , Sujet âgé , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Carcinome épidermoïde/chirurgie , Lymphadénectomie/méthodes , Tumeurs du pénis/chirurgie , Carcinome épidermoïde/anatomopathologie , Études de faisabilité , Canal inguinal/chirurgie , Lymphadénectomie/effets indésirables , Métastase lymphatique/anatomopathologie , Grading des tumeurs , Durée opératoire , Période périopératoire , Complications postopératoires , Tumeurs du pénis/anatomopathologie , Études rétrospectives , Appréciation des risques , Facteurs temps , Résultat thérapeutique , Charge tumorale
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche