RÉSUMÉ
CONTEXT AND AIM: The prognosis of primary gliosarcoma (PGS) remains dismal with current treatment modalities. We analyzed the outcome of PGS patients treated with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective single institutional analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 27 patients of PGS treated with radiotherapy (RT) and TMZ during 2007‑2012. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the use of Kaplan Meier method and toxicities were evaluate using common terminology criteria for adverse events version 2.0 (National Cancer Institute, USA). RESULTS: Median age at presentation and Karnofsky performance status was 45 years and 90 respectively and male: female ratio was 20:7. Patients received adjuvant RT to a total dose of 60 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction. All patients except 5 received adjuvant TMZ to a median number of 6 cycles. Grade 2 and 3 hematological toxicity was seen in 8% and 4% of patients respectively during concurrent RT. During adjuvant chemotherapy, 13.6% had Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and 9.5% had Grade 3 neutropenia. Median OS was 16.7 months (1 year and 2 year actuarial OS was 70.8% and 32.6% respectively). Adjuvant TMZ was associated with a better survival (median survival 21.21 vs. 11.93 months; P = 0.0046) on univariate analysis and also on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.503‑25.58; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study, largest series of patients with PGS treated with concurrent and adjuvant TMZ shows an impressive survival with acceptable toxicity. We suggest TMZ be included in the “standard of care” for this tumor.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The significant impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on cardiac morbidity in patients of early breast cancer (EBC) undergoing breast‑conserving surgery has been shown in different studies. The present study was conducted to assess the impact of surgery and the side of involvement on radiation dose to left anterior descending artery (LAD) and Left circumflex coronary artery (LCx). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 58 patients of EBC were randomly chosen for this dosimetric study and planned with tangential field technique without intensity modulation (IM). Heart, LAD, and LCx (n = 55) were contoured. Dose volume histograms were analyzed to determine the Dmax (maximum dose) and Dmean (mean dose) of LAD and LCx. Student’s t‑test was used for comparative analysis of the means. RESULTS: The mean Dmax of LAD for left (L) EBC was 3.17 Gray (Gy) while for right (R) EBC it was 0.86 Gy (P = 0.007; 95% C.I, 1.14–3.48). The mean Dmean of LAD for L‑EBC and R‑EBC were 1.97 Gy and 0.79 Gy, respectively (P = 0.029; 95% C.I, 0.77–1.60). The mean‑Dmax of LCx for patients with L‑EBC (2.9 Gy; range: 1.2–4.35 Gy) was statistically higher than that for R‑EBC (1.3 Gy; range: 0.7–3.2 Gy) (P = 0.045). The mean‑Dmean of LCx for L‑EBC (2.1 Gy; range: 0.6–3.6 Gy) was also significantly higher than that of L‑EBC (0.9 Gy; range: 0.7–2.1 Gy) (P = 0.03). There was no significant impact of the pattern of surgery on LAD dose, but significance was noted for LCx dose parameters (P = 0.04 and 0.08 for m‑Dmax and m‑Dmean of LCx). CONCLUSION: This pilot dosimetric study confirms the assumption that patients with left‑sided EBC are at higher risk of developing long‑term cardiac morbidity when treated with PORT due to increased dose to LAD.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Malignant tumors of the trachea are rare. A multimodality treatment approach is often necessary. Outcomes of radical non-surgical approaches are sparse. Radiation combined with sequential or concurrent chemotherapy is an important treatment option. Materials and Methods: We present an analysis of outcomes using modern radiotherapy and chemotherapy for tracheal tumors. Results: Radiation dose escalation using modern techniques is of benefit for these tumors. The results with chemotherapy are encouraging. Conclusions: Radiation plays a distinct role and should be a part of treatment for these tumors. The role of chemotherapy needs to be studied further.
Sujet(s)
Chimioradiothérapie/méthodes , Chimioradiothérapie/tendances , Humains , Chimioradiothérapie/statistiques et données numériques , Tumeurs de la trachée/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs de la trachée/radiothérapieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: In upper abdominal malignancies (UAM), due to the presence of multiple inhomogeneous tissues, a wedge-based conformal treatment planning results in high-dose regions inside the target volume. AIM: This study was designed to explore the feasibility of using a field-in-field (FIF) technique in different UAM and its efficacy in reducing the high-dose regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients of UAM (which included malignancies of the gastroesophageal junction, stomach, gall bladder, and pancreas) were selected for this study. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed and three-dimensional conformal wedge plans were generated for all the cases. The same plan was copied with the wedges removed and a FIF plan was generated. The two plans were compared for mean, maximum, and median doses; dose received by 2% (D2) and 98% (D98) of the target volume; volume receiving> 107% (V > 107%) and < 95% (V Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, version 10.0. RESULTS: For all the cases, the FIF technique was better than wedge-based planning in terms of maximum dose, D2, V > 107%, and CI; there was a statistically significant reduction in monitor units. With regard to doses to critical structures, there was marginal dose reduction for the kidneys and spinal cord with FIF as compared to wedge-based planning. CONCLUSION: The FIF technique can be employed for UAM in place of wedge-based conformal treatment plans.
Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de l'abdomen/radiothérapie , Relation dose-effet des rayonnements , Humains , Dosimétrie en radiothérapie , Planification de radiothérapie assistée par ordinateur/instrumentation , Planification de radiothérapie assistée par ordinateur/méthodes , Radiothérapie conformationnelle , TomodensitométrieRÉSUMÉ
AIM: The aim of our study was to compare the two standard treatment approaches in muscle invasive carcinoma of urinary bladder--radical cystectomy and chemo radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of bladder of stages, T2 to T4, N0/N1/N2 and M0 were included in the study. Patients were allotted to two arms of the study. Arm A consisted of radical cystectomy. Adjuvant CMV chemotherapy was given for T3/T4 or Node positive disease only. Arm B received 2 cycles of neoadjuvant CMV chemo therapy followed by concurrent chemo radiation. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were recruited into the study. Thirty patients in the surgical arm and 13 patients in the chemo radiation arm. The actuarial two-year survival rate in surgical arm is 56% while in chemo radiation arm it is 54%. There was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival also between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Chemo radiation yielded equivalent survival results with radical cystectomy. So it is worth giving preference to chemo radiation that will give a better quality of life for the patient.
Sujet(s)
Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Carcinome transitionnel/radiothérapie , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs musculaires/radiothérapie , Invasion tumorale , Résultat thérapeutique , Tumeurs de la vessie urinaire/anatomopathologieRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: This study was mainly framed to study the difference in tumor volumes as seen on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) and their significance in planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with brain tumor of different diagnoses who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy were included in this study. CT and MR imaging was done for all the patients with 2.5 mm slice thickness. The CT tumor volume and MR tumor volume were measured and compared with each other. The center of mass (CM) of the tumor volume delineated on CT and MR were computed and the shift between the two CMs was determined. RESULTS: The mean and median volume of the tumor as measured from MR scans was 19.67 cc +/- 13.73 and 16.13 cc (range: 3.25 cc-50.37 cc). Similarly, the mean and median volume of the tumor as measured from CT scans was 15.05 cc +/- 10.13 and 11.63 cc (range: 3.0 cc-36.25 cc) respectively. The mean and median CM shift between CT and MR was 5.47 mm and 5.21 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that MR is an indispensable imaging modality in radiotherapy for planning brain tumors.