Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 1 de 1
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Bol. Asoc. Méd. P. R ; 92(9/12): 130-132, Sept.-Dec. 2000.
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-411257

Résumé

There has been controversy in the health professions about the necessity for newborn infant hearing screening. It is well accepted that patient history or a birth that places the infant in the high-risk registry (HHR) can identify 50 of all infants born with permanent bilateral hearing loss. Two major factors which have been cited as reasons for not screening the well-baby nursery have been poor cost effectiveness and the lack of documentation as to the benefits derived from early identification and intervention. Recent technological developments and published data are presented which indicate that economical well-baby hearing screening can be done in any setting, and that the language acquisition of the infant is permanently affected if the intervention is not done in the first six months after birth


Sujets)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Nouveau-né , Nourrisson , Tests auditifs , Dépistage néonatal , Perte d'audition/diagnostic , Âge de début , Analyse coût-bénéfice , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Perte d'audition/économie , Perte d'audition/épidémiologie , Porto Rico/épidémiologie , Tests auditifs/économie , Tests auditifs/instrumentation , Tests auditifs , Troubles du langage/économie , Troubles du langage/épidémiologie , Troubles du langage/étiologie , Incapacités d'apprentissage/économie , Incapacités d'apprentissage/épidémiologie , Incapacités d'apprentissage/étiologie , Dépistage néonatal/économie , Dépistage néonatal/instrumentation , Dépistage néonatal
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche