Résumé
A total of 30 patients suffering from brucellosis were suspected based on history taking, clinical manifestations and positive serum tube agglutination test [at titer >/= 1/160]. The followings were done for all cases; complete blood picture [differential leucocytic count] and liver function tests, serodiagnosis of Brucella [serum tube agglutination test [STAT] as well as Rose Bengal test [RBT] and PCR. The study aimed to analyze the diagnostic value of RBT as compared to STAT and PCR for human brucellosis, and to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, the cost and the time consuming of RBT as compared to STAT and PCR. There was a significant difference between diagnosis by RBT and both STAT >/= 1/640, and STAT >/= 1/1280. Also, there was a significant difference between PCR and both STAT>1/640, and STAT >/= 1/1280. No significant difference was detected between RBT in diagnosing acute and chronic infection. STAT >/= 1/320 proved to be better than STAT at other titers and RBT in diagnosis of brucellosis. RBT proved to be suitable as screening test regarding time [faster] and cost. But, STAT >/= 1/320 from a practical and economic point of views proved to be the best one in diagnosing human brucellosis