Screening for Distress and Its Impact on Palliative Care Referral at a General Medical Center: Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: Distress screening is mandated by Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, however there is few data available on its effect in actual practice. We examined the impact of distress screening on palliative care referral at Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center in Japan. Materials and Methods: We implemented distress screening on cancer patients who were given chemotherapy from February 2018. Patients were referred to the palliative care team when the physicians judged the need on the basis of the screening results or when the patients themselves wanted to receive the palliative care service. We examined the number of the patients referred to the palliative care team, then we researched the changes of the number after implementation of the screening, using the regression discontinuity analysis. Results: The distress screening didn’t increase the number of the patients who were referred to the palliative care team: the estimated difference of the number was 3.32 (95% confidence interval: −3.19〜9.82). Conclusion: We implemented distress screening at our hospital but it didn’t increase palliative care referral. Only a few studies have examined how routine screening impacts clinical outcomes. We expect our study helps to research the effectiveness of screening in each healthcare facility.

Clinical Influence of Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis on Neurological Outcome after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Fracture or Dislocation

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To clarify the influence of cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) on neurological functional recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The biomechanical etiology of traumatic CSCI remains under discussion and its relationship with CSCS is one of the most controversial issues in the clinical management of traumatic CSCI. METHODS: To obtain a relatively uniform background, patients non-surgically treated for an acute C3-4 level CSCI without major fracture or dislocation were selected. We analyzed 58 subjects with traumatic CSCI using T2-weighted mid-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The sagittal diameter of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) column, degree of canal stenosis, and neurologic outcomes in motor function, including improvement rate, were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant relationships between sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their American Spinal Injury Association motor scores at both admission and discharge. Moreover, no significant relationships were observed between the sagittal diameter of the CSF column at the C3-4 segment and their neurological recovery during the following period. CONCLUSIONS: No relationships between pre-existing CSCS and neurological outcomes were evident after traumatic CSCI. These results suggest that decompression surgery might not be recommended for traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation despite pre-existing CSCS.