Both Ocular Perforation Caused by Periocular Acupuncture Therapy

Purpose@#To report a case of both ocular perforation due to periocular acupuncture therapy with vitrectomy in the right eye andbarrier laser photocoagulation without vitrectomy in the left eye.Case summary: A 58-year-old female presented with ocular pain and decreased visual acuity in both eye. She had received periocularacupuncture therapy 4 days earlier. Dilated fundoscopy revealed vitreous hemorrhage. B-scan ultrasonography revealedvitreous opacity. Thus, at the request of the patient, vitrectomy was performed in only the right eye, and did not performed in theleft eye. Intraoperatively, we identified retinal laceration in the temporal and inferior retina. In the left eye, the sites of retinal hemorrhagewere observed in the temporal and inferior retina in the fundus examination, and a barrier laser photocoagulation wasperformed around the lesion. At the three-month postoperative follow-up, the patient’s visual acuity was 0.5 in the right eye withoutmacular edema. In the left eye, visual acuity was 0.01 with macular edema observed on optical coherence tomography. @*Conclusions@#Authors present a case of a patient with vitreous hemorrhage and ocular perforations caused by periocular acupuncturetherapy in both eye, able to compare the results of eyes that performed vitrectomy and that did not performed vitrectomyin a same patient. The recovery of visual acuity in eye that performed vitrectomy was better than eye that did not performedvitrectomy. Therefore, we consider performing vitrectomy in patients with eye perforation.

Comparison of Myopic Progression before and after Orthokeratology Lens Treatment

PURPOSE: To compare the myopic progression before and after wearing an orthokeratology lens (OK). METHODS: Twenty-six patients (49 eyes) with at least 6 months of myopia prior to OK treatment were evaluated. Changes in the spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error and axial length were compared before and after OK use. Changes in the SE and axial length were also compared between two groups according to the myopic progression before baseline: Group 1 with myopic progression 1 D/year. RESULTS: The myopic progression rate decreased from −1.1 to −0.3 D/year after OK treatment (p < 0.001). Greater increases in axial length were observed in patients who were younger and had less myopia at baseline, a higher rate of myopia progression before baseline, and a shorter axial length at baseline (p < 0.001, p < 0.004, p < 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively). The increase in axial length was significantly greater in the group with greater myopic progression before baseline (0.2 mm/year) than in the group with less myopic progression (0.1 mm/year) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Myopic progression was reduced significantly after OK treatment.