Résumé
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of the use of sheathless common 7-F guiding catheter with those of conventional 6-F sheath guiding catheter in performing transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery lesions.Methods The clinical data of 160 consecutive patients with coronary artery lesions,who were treated with transradial PCI during the period from January 2014 to June 2015,were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were randomly divided into sheathless group (n=80,using sheathless common 7-F guiding catheter) and sheath group (n=80,using conventional 6-F sheath guiding catheter).The accuracy of the guiding catheter placement,the compression time for the punctured radial artery,the success rate of hemostasis,the incidence of radial artery spasm,the postoperative diameter of radial artery,the fading time of swelling at distal arm,the forearm pain or discomfort,the formation of forearm hematoma,the incidence of pseudoaneurysm and radial artery occlusion,the skin ischemia necrosis,etc.were recorded,and the results were compared between the two groups.Results In the sheathless group and the sheath group,the radial artery spasm was observed in 9 patients and 2 patients respectively,the forearm pain or discomfort was seen in 7 patients and one patient respectively,the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P＜0.05).No statistically significant differences in the accuracy of the guiding catheter placement,the compression time for the punctured radial artery,the formation of forearm hematoma,the success rate of hemostasis,the postoperative diameter of radial artery,the incidence of radial artery occlusion and the skin ischemia necrosis existed between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion Compared to the use of conventional 6-F sheath guiding catheter,the use of sheathless common 7-F guiding catheter is safe and effective in treating coronary artery lesions with transradial PCI.