Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Femoral Anteversion: Transverse Section Versus Axial Oblique Section / 계명의대학술지

This study aimed to define a more accurate computed tomography (CT) scanning method for measurement of the anteversion angle of the femoral neck. Five models of the femur, consisting of three models of saw bones and two of cadaveric bones, were used to measure femoral anteversion. Real femoral anteversion was measured with photographs taken from the superior aspect of the femoral neck after placing the specimen in the position that both posterior condyles rested on the surface of the table and the center of the femoral head and center of the intercondylar notch were aligned in a single line. Femoral anteversion using the transverse section of CT (CT1) and the axial oblique section of CT (CT2) were obtained. Three experienced orthopedic surgeons measured the anteversion of five bone models using the photographs and two CT scans, three times each with a week interval between measurements. A total of 45 measurements were obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare anteversion measurements between the different methods. Femoral anteversion measured in photographs was correlated with measurements on CT1 and CT2. However, CT2 more closely approximated the real anteversion than did CT1 (ICC; CT1 = 0.824, CT2 = 0.937). Inter-observer and intra-observer biases were not found (ICC ≥ 0.952). The axial oblique image more closely approximated the real femoral anteversion than did the transverse sectional image. Measurement of femoral anteversion using axial oblique CT is recommended over conventional transverse sectional CT.

Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Femoral Anteversion: Transverse Section Versus Axial Oblique Section / 계명의대학술지

This study aimed to define a more accurate computed tomography (CT) scanning method for measurement of the anteversion angle of the femoral neck. Five models of the femur, consisting of three models of saw bones and two of cadaveric bones, were used to measure femoral anteversion. Real femoral anteversion was measured with photographs taken from the superior aspect of the femoral neck after placing the specimen in the position that both posterior condyles rested on the surface of the table and the center of the femoral head and center of the intercondylar notch were aligned in a single line. Femoral anteversion using the transverse section of CT (CT1) and the axial oblique section of CT (CT2) were obtained. Three experienced orthopedic surgeons measured the anteversion of five bone models using the photographs and two CT scans, three times each with a week interval between measurements. A total of 45 measurements were obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare anteversion measurements between the different methods. Femoral anteversion measured in photographs was correlated with measurements on CT1 and CT2. However, CT2 more closely approximated the real anteversion than did CT1 (ICC; CT1 = 0.824, CT2 = 0.937). Inter-observer and intra-observer biases were not found (ICC ≥ 0.952). The axial oblique image more closely approximated the real femoral anteversion than did the transverse sectional image. Measurement of femoral anteversion using axial oblique CT is recommended over conventional transverse sectional CT.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Hip Arthroplasty

Although the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty is expected to increase, these complex fractures are still challenging complications. To obtain optimal results for these fractures, thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation, precise classification, and understanding of modern management principles are mandatory. The Vancouver classification system is a simple, effective, and reproducible method for planning proper treatments of these injuries. The fractures associated with a stable femoral stem can be effectively treated with osteosynthesis, though periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with a loose stem require revision arthroplasty. We describe here the principles of proper treatment for the patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures as well as how to avoid complications.

Bilateral Medial Tibial Plateau Fracture after Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Tibial plateau fractures after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are rare, and only isolated cases have been reported. The authors describe a case of bilateral medial tibial plateau fracture following a minor motorcycle accident in a patient who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in the past. Two years and four months before the accident, the patient underwent an arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction using double-bundle technique on his left knee at a hospital. He had the same surgery using single-bundle technique on his right knee about eight months ago at another hospital. The fractures in his both involved knees occurred through the tibial tunnel and required open reduction with internal fixation. At three weeks after fixation, a second-look arthroscopy revealed intact ACLs in both knees. At five months follow-up, he was able to walk without instability on physical examination. Follow-up radiographs of the patient showed callus formations with healed fractures.

The Efficacy of Trochanteric Flip Osteotomy in Cases of Femoral Head Fracture / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of the trochanteric flip osteotomy in cases of femoral head fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2000 and January 2012, we evaluated 14 cases of femoral head fractures treated by trochanteric flip osteotomy in combination with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach after a minimum follow-up of one year. There were 13 men and one woman and the average follow-up period was 36.4 months. The clinical results were evaluated according to Merle d'Aubigne-Postel scores and the Thompson-Epstein scoring scale and the radiological results were evaluated according to time to union of fractures and osteotomy site. We also evaluated the incidence of complications. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, mean Merle d'Aubigne-Postel score was 16.4 and 11 cases out of 14 patients presented with good to excellent, two cases presented with fair, and one case presented with a poor clinical result according to the Thompson-Epstein scoring scale. Radiologically all cases achieved union of fractures and osteotomy site and the mean time to union of the osteotomy site was 7.9 weeks. Complications included one case of heterotopic ossification which did not disturb hip function, two cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and one case of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: The trochanteric flip osteotomy in the case of a femoral head fracture showed good clinical and radiological results through good visualization and accurate reduction of the fracture site. However, conduct of further studies including larger number of patients is needed in order to evaluate the incidence of complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head.