Résumé
Objective:To investigate the effect of oblique lateral lumbar intervertebral fusion (OLIF) on inflammatory factors in patients with degenerative spinal canal stenosis (DLSS).Methods:Retrospective analysis of clinical data of 64 DLSS patients in the department of orthopedics, Jizhong Energy Fengfeng Group Hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 was performed. There were 35 males and 34 females, aged (60.70±6.27) years, and the age range was 20 to 80 years. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into posterior decompression and internal fixation fusion (PLIF) group ( n=32) and OLIF group ( n=32). The coperation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative bed rest time, hospitalization time , the back and leg pain visual analogue score (VAS) , Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) score of lumbar vertebrae and serum inflammatory factors [tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α), interleukin-1alpha(IL-1α), C-reactive protein(CRP)] were observed at preoperative, 3 months and last follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed and survial up to March 2019. Measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( Mean± SD), comparison between groups was performed using independent sample t test or analysis of variance of repeated measurement data. Internal comparisons were performed using paired t tests. Count data were expressed as percentage (%), and χ2 test was used. Results:There was no significant difference in operation time between OLIF group and PLIF group ( P>0.05). In OLIF group, the amount of blood loss (119.72±30.41) mL, bedridden time (2.16±0.35) d and postoperative hospital stay (5.18±2.06) d were significantly lower than that of PLIF group[(318.26±94.62) mL, (3.17±0.54) d, (7.35±1.24) d], the differences between the two groups were statistically significant( P<0.05). All patients were followed for 8 months. The 3 months after operation and last follow-up, the VAS scores of back pain in OLIF group [(1.93±0.54) scores, (1.74±0.63) scores]were significantly lower than that in PLIF group [(4.05±0.62) scores, (3.87±0.74) scores]. The VAS scores of leg pain in OLIF group [(1.56±0.71) scores, (1.37±0.52) scores] were significantly lower than that of PLIF group [(3.74±0.79) scores, (2.53±0.59) scores]. The JOA scores of lumbar vertebrae in PLIF group [(22.57 ±1.83) scores, (24.38±1.65) scores] were significantly higher than that of PLIF group [(20.35±1.78) scores, (22.14±1.35) scores], the differences between the two groups were statistically significant( P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, the levels of serum TNF-α(16.95±3.92) ng/L, IL-1α(9.17±3.78) ng/L and CRP (1.97±0.24) mg/L in OLIF group were significantly lower than those in PLIF group [(20.46 ±4.27) ng/L, (11.51±4.25) ng/L, (2.36±0.32) mg/L]. Last follow-up, the level of serum TNF-α(13.47±3.54) ng/L, IL-1α(6.52±2.09) ng/L and CRP (1.42±0.16) mg/L in the OLIF group were significantly lower than those in the PLIF group [(18.08±3.84) ng/L, (8.73±5.43) ng/L, (2.04±0.25) mg/L], the differences between the two groups were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with PLIF, OLIF can reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding, shorten the recovery time, reduce the expression of inflammatory factors and improve the prognosis of patients with DLSS.
Résumé
Objective To investigate the efficacy of modified electrical superficial surround acupuncture in treating postherpetic neuralgia. Method One hundred and eighty-six patients with postherpetic neuralgia were randomly allocated to electrical acupuncture, superficial acupuncture and electrical superficial acupuncture groups, 62 cases each. All the three groups were given acupuncture at ashi points around the painful region. The electrical acupuncture group received electroacupuncture alone. The superficial acupuncture group received sweeping-dispersing manipulation and following 24-hour retention of the soft tube. The electrical superficial acupuncture group received sweeping-dispersing manipulation based on modified superficial acupuncture and following electroacupuncture, without retention of the soft tube after the completion of treatment. The therapeutic effects were evaluated and compared after one course of treatment. Result There was a statistically significant pre-/post-treatment difference in the VAS score in the three groups (P0.05). The evaluation of the therapeutic effects according to WHO pain rating showed that the marked efficacy rate and the total efficacy rate were 45.2% and 82.3%, respectively, in the electrical acupuncture group, 52.3% and 88.7%, respectively, in the superficial acupuncture group and 62.9% and 91.9%, respectively, in the electrical superficial acupuncture group. There was no statistically significant difference in the total efficacy rate between the three groups (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the marked efficacy rate between the electrical acupuncture and electrical superficial acupuncture groups (P0.05) and between the superficial acupuncture and electrical superficial acupuncture groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of electrical superficial acupuncture is better than that of superficial acupuncture and electrical acupuncture. Electrical superficial acupuncture is characterized by selection of few points, small number of treatments and meanwhile, avoidance of potential medical risks.