The effects of home safety intervention on guardians’ behaviors of injury prevention in injured children: a double blind randomized controlled study

Purpose@#The optimal time for home safety intervention for children’s injury prevention is during the injury-related visits to emergency departments. The authors investigated the effect of home safety equipment provision on the guardians’ perception of injury prevention and attitude toward it, and the use of home safety equipment. @*Methods@#We conducted a double blind randomized controlled study on guardians of children aged 7 years or younger who visited the emergency department with accidental injuries. After completing the structured, pre-intervention survey on home safety, the guardians were randomly assigned to receive either home safety equipment (the intervention group) or stationery (the control group) in the same opaque boxes enclosing pamphlets about home safety education. After 4 weeks, the guardians were contacted for the post-intervention survey. The questionnaires for the latter survey consisted of the same contents with 2 added questions regarding the use of new home safety equipment after intervention. Logistic regressions were conducted to identify factors associated with the outcome (i.e., behavioral change). @*Results@#From April through October 2019, we approached 972 guardians. Of these, 59 guardians answered both pre- and post-intervention surveys. No differences were found in the perception and attitude, and use of home safety equipment between the intervention and control groups at the pre- and post-intervention surveys. No variables were associated with the primary outcome. @*Conclusion@#Provision of home safety equipment may be inadequate to improve guardians’ behaviors about prevention of domestic injuries.

The effects of home safety intervention on guardians’ behaviors of injury prevention in injured children: a double blind randomized controlled study

Purpose@#The optimal time for home safety intervention for children’s injury prevention is during the injury-related visits to emergency departments. The authors investigated the effect of home safety equipment provision on the guardians’ perception of injury prevention and attitude toward it, and the use of home safety equipment. @*Methods@#We conducted a double blind randomized controlled study on guardians of children aged 7 years or younger who visited the emergency department with accidental injuries. After completing the structured, pre-intervention survey on home safety, the guardians were randomly assigned to receive either home safety equipment (the intervention group) or stationery (the control group) in the same opaque boxes enclosing pamphlets about home safety education. After 4 weeks, the guardians were contacted for the post-intervention survey. The questionnaires for the latter survey consisted of the same contents with 2 added questions regarding the use of new home safety equipment after intervention. Logistic regressions were conducted to identify factors associated with the outcome (i.e., behavioral change). @*Results@#From April through October 2019, we approached 972 guardians. Of these, 59 guardians answered both pre- and post-intervention surveys. No differences were found in the perception and attitude, and use of home safety equipment between the intervention and control groups at the pre- and post-intervention surveys. No variables were associated with the primary outcome. @*Conclusion@#Provision of home safety equipment may be inadequate to improve guardians’ behaviors about prevention of domestic injuries.

The effect of medically-attended injury experience on the use of home safety equipment

Purpose@#To assess the effect of medically-attended injury (MAI) on the use of home safety equipment, we analyzed the differences in parents’ perception and attitude about injury prevention, and use of home safety equipment depending on the children’s MAI experiences. @*Methods@#From March 2018 through February 2019, we surveyed parents of children aged 5 years or younger via a mobile phone. The parents were divided into the MAI and non-MAI groups. The mobile survey focused on the perception and attitude about injury prevention, and use of home safety equipment (if not used, barriers). @*Results@#Of the 204 parents, 75 (36.8%) reported their children’s MAI, comprising the MAI group. This group used the safety equipment more frequently than the non-MAI group (odds ratio, 7.03; 95% confidence interval, 3.39-14.59; P < 0.001). No significant differences between the 2 groups were found in the perception and attitude about injury prevention, barriers to the use of the equipment, and the type of the equipment in use. @*Conclusion@#Parents’ experience in their children’s MAIs was associated with the use of home safety equipment, but it did not affect their perception and attitude about injury prevention. A visit to the emergency department with MAI is an opportunity for education on injury prevention and changes of the attitude.

The effect of medically-attended injury experience on the use of home safety equipment

Purpose@#To assess the effect of medically-attended injury (MAI) on the use of home safety equipment, we analyzed the differences in parents’ perception and attitude about injury prevention, and use of home safety equipment depending on the children’s MAI experiences. @*Methods@#From March 2018 through February 2019, we surveyed parents of children aged 5 years or younger via a mobile phone. The parents were divided into the MAI and non-MAI groups. The mobile survey focused on the perception and attitude about injury prevention, and use of home safety equipment (if not used, barriers). @*Results@#Of the 204 parents, 75 (36.8%) reported their children’s MAI, comprising the MAI group. This group used the safety equipment more frequently than the non-MAI group (odds ratio, 7.03; 95% confidence interval, 3.39-14.59; P < 0.001). No significant differences between the 2 groups were found in the perception and attitude about injury prevention, barriers to the use of the equipment, and the type of the equipment in use. @*Conclusion@#Parents’ experience in their children’s MAIs was associated with the use of home safety equipment, but it did not affect their perception and attitude about injury prevention. A visit to the emergency department with MAI is an opportunity for education on injury prevention and changes of the attitude.

Administration and Efficiency Comparison of Chloral Hydrate during Pediatric Sedation

PURPOSE: In most emergency department (ED), sedation is required before carrying out an invasive procedure on a pediatric patient. In the ED setting, it is essential to determine the optimal dose and administration route of CH for successful sedation. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of CH for an invasive procedure and to examine the effectiveness of the drug's different administration routes. Furthermore, in this study, we performed simple survey using questionnaire which composed of Likert-scale to evaluate satisfaction of medical staffs in ED with administration routes. METHODS: This study was conducted prospectively. The study participants were pediatric patients under 8 years old who visited the ED in two tertiary hospitals in South Korea within a period of 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 300 patients were included in this study. The age, sex, and weight of the patients were not shown to influence the sedation time. Chloral hydrate dosage is the independent factor to influence the both sedation and discharge time (p<0.01). In the comparison of the groups, groups 1, 2, and 5 showed no significant difference. On the other hand, groups 3 and 4 were shown to be statistically significantly different from group 1. CONCLUSION: Up to 100 mg/kg CH is safe to use in the emergency department for pediatric patients, but the initial dose of 50 mg/kg for oral administration should be considered in advance because it can provide safe and effective sedation with a lower possibility of causing an adverse effect.