Résumé
Home-based and in hospital pharmacists at our hospital pharmacy participated in this study. A survey of the home-based pharmacists’ work contents was tabulated from November 2019 to May 2021. Furthermore, a questionnaire survey was administered within the pharmacy in May 2020. 90% of the hospital pharmacists would consider some drug information management to be able to work from home. Moreover, evaluation of the questionnaires revealed that more than 90% of the in-hospital pharmacists were “satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” with deliverables of home-based pharmacists. The in-hospital pharmacists found communication tools (e.g., social networking services, telephone, and web-conferencing systems) to be useful for facilitating collaboration with the home-based pharmacist. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the internet environment to work from home. Moreover, it is important to create an environment where pharmacists can work from home according to their desire and needs in cases such as childcare, nursing care, during treatment, and during a pandemic. This study indicates that hospital pharmacists can carry out their responsibilities and demonstrate their work abilities not only in the hospital pharmacy setting but also in a remote working environment.
Résumé
<b>Objective: </b>The present study investigated awareness and knowledge about clinical trials among pharmacists working in the Nagano Hokushin area as well as their contribution to the enlightenment of clinical trial.<br><b>Methods: </b>A questionnaire survey of clinical trials was conducted to evaluate levels of interest, impressions, sources of information, and knowledge among hospital and community pharmacists.<br><b>Results: </b>We received responses from 77 hospital and 67 community pharmacists. The levels of interest in clinical trials were not significantly different between hospital and community pharmacists. About impressions, hospital pharmacists thought that clinical trials were “a new development.” Contrarily, community pharmacists thought that clinical trials were “a field that they were seldom concerned with.” About sources of information, hospital pharmacists found that “study meetings” were the most informative. More community pharmacists than hospital pharmacists chose “general reports, for example, newspapers and televisions” as a source of information, and similarly more community pharmacists indicated that they had “few opportunities for obtaining information about clinical trials.” About knowledge, the percentage of correct answers about clinical trials between hospital and community pharmacists was not significantly different. A higher percentage of community pharmacists than hospital pharmacists answered unknown.<br><b>Conclusion: </b>Hospital and community pharmacists had different impressions and knowledge about clinical trials probably because of differences in sources of information and its access. Henceforth, study meetings involving educational material about clinical trials should be held for discussing fundamental knowledge about the methods and structure of clinical trials and for discussing case studies wherein patients consult pharmacists about clinical trials.
Résumé
A questionnaire survey was taken on the subjects administered an investigational new drug in order to look into their attitude toward a clinical testing and assessment of the work of the pharmacists clinical research coordinating the testing. Questionnaires were sent to 75 outpatients who were tested on with a new drug between January 2001 and March 2006. 55 individuals responded to the inquiry. All the subjects were taken care of by the coordinators by turns. The major concerns to the testees when they participated in the trial were the adverse reactions and efficacy of the new drug. Of the subjects who felt uneasy, 79.4% cited the adverse reactions and 50% about the efficacy. Some 80% of the respondents said they were satisfied with the explanation given beforehand about the nature of the clinical testing. The majority of the subjects, when they were in a fix, turned to pharmacist clinical reave coordinators for advice, not the physician nor nurses. The guidance given by the clinical reave coordinators about medication was generally received favorably. From the above-mentioned findings, it was made clear that the pharmacists clinical research coordinating the clinical trial played an important role as consultants in alleviating the anxiety of the testees during the trial. In the future, pharmacists will do the best to measure up to the expectations as coordinators in the clinical trial of new drugs by improving care of the testees individually while taking into their backgrounds and wishes into full consideration.