The Digastric Muscle: Its Anatomy and Functions Revisited / El Músculo Digástrico: Revisión de su Anatomía y Funciones

SUMMARY: As one of the suprahyoid muscles, the digastric muscle is characterized by two separate bellies of different embryologic origins. The origin of the anterior belly is the digastric fossa, while the origin of the posterior belly is the mastoid notch. They share a common insertion: the intermediate tendon. When the digastric muscle contracts, the hyoid bone is raised. Opening of the jaw and swallowing of food boli are associated with digastric muscle activity. This review discusses the general anatomic features of the digastric muscle and its variation, primary functions, and clinical implications focused on surgical reconstruction and rejuvenation.

Como uno de los músculos suprahioideos, el músculo digástrico se caracteriza por dos vientres separados, de diferentes orígenes embriológicos. El origen del vientre anterior es la fosa digástrica, mientras que el origen del vientre posterior es la incisura mastoidea. Comparten una inserción común, El tendón intermedio. Cuando el músculo digástrico se contrae, el hueso hioides se eleva. La apertura de la mandíbula y la deglución del bolo alimenticio se asocian con la actividad del músculo digástrico. Esta revisión analiza las características anatómicas generales del músculo digástrico y su variación, funciones primarias e implicaciones clínicas centradas en la reconstrucción y el rejuvenecimiento quirúrgico.

Association between ambient temperature and lower urinary tract symptoms: a community-based survey

ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual change of International prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) in each patient by temperature conditions. Materials and Methods The severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) was explored using the IPSS and OABSS questionnaires that were completed by 2.486 subjects (923 males and 1.563 females) aged 60 years and older. Korea Meteorological Administration data was used to determine daily average temperature and daily temperature difference on the interview dates at each site. Results The mean IPSS and mean age for males was 13.45±8.24 and 75.03±6.20 years, respectively. The mean OABSS and mean age for females was 4.41±3.10 and 73.74±6.03years, respectively. Daily average temperature and daily temperature difference ranged from-3.4-28.3oC and 2.2-16.9oC, respectively. Age was a significantly risk factor for IPSS, OABSS, and QoL (P<0.001, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively). After multiple regression analysis, daily average temperatures did not show a statistically significant change in IPSS and OABSS. Only daily temperature differences were associated with male LUTS. Conclusions While LUTS could be worsened in low temperatures generally, IPSS and OABSS were not affected by daily average temperature conditions. Daily temperature differences may be more influential than daily average temperatures.