Civilian rectal trauma: the surgical challenge

Using the Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care's operative database and information from the Trauma Registry for patients presenting after 1998, a retrospective study of patients seen between the period 1992 and 2002 was done at the University Hospital of the West Indies with the objective of determining the treatment and outcome of patients with a diagnosis of rectal trauma. Over the 10-year period, 45 patients were seen with this diagnosis. Eighty-two per cent of the cases were males, with a mean age of 29.8 years (range 16-70 years) while the eight female patients had a mean age of 36.8 years. Low velocity gunshot wounds accounted for 64 of the entire group and for 78 in males. Six of the eight cases seen in females were iatrogenic occurring during gynaecological operations. Sixty-three per cent of rectal injuries were associated with other injuries with the genitourinary system most commonly involved The majority (83) were diagnosed preoperatively by visualization of the rectal wound or the presence of blood on proctosigmoidoscopy. All the patients had peri-operative antibiotics and diversion with a proximal sigmoid colostomy. Fifteen per cent of cases had presacral drain insertion. Distal rectal washout was not used. There were no deaths. Seventy-three per cent of patients had closure during the period under review at an average time of 8.5 months after initial surgery. The other 27 after an average of 23 months did not have documented closure. The mainstay of treatment for civilian rectal trauma remains diverting sigmoid loop colostomy, despite its morbidity, and peri-operative antibiotics

Surgical management of perforated duodenal ulcer: the changing scene

To determine the management of perforated duodenal ulcer at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) in this era of Helicobacter pylori, the medical records of all patients seen at the UHWI during the period July 1997 to June 2002 with an intra-operative diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer were reviewed The records were analyzed for the following: age, gender, duration of symptoms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, smoking status, operative repair duration of hospitalization, Helicobacter pylori status and medical therapy, peri-operative complications, mortality and recurrence. Ninety per cent of the cases were males. All females in whom perforation occurred were age 50 years and older compared to males where 58 of cases presented before age 50 years. Perforations in acute ulcers occurred in 80 of cases. The majority of patients were male smokers. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was also an important risk factor in elderly females. Simple surgical closure and standard triple therapy antibiotics to eradicate Helicobacter pylori was the most common treatment offered. Mortality was one per cent and follow-up poor but 11 of patients had documented recurrent peptic ulceration. In this study population, perforated duodenal ulcer occured overwhelmingly in males less than 50 years of age. There is a trend towards exclusive simple surgical closure and H pylori eradication at the UHWI for patients with perforated duodenal ulcer but this needs to be supported by documentation of H pylori prevalence in the population of patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcers