Résumé
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the relationship between spontaneous miscarriage and chromosomal aberrations identifiable with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 440 product-of-conceptions were collected for the CMA testing.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Four hundred and seventeen of 440 specimens (94.7%) were successfully detected, among which 209 (50.1%) were chromosomal abnormalities. One hundred and twenty-nine (61.7%) of the 209 specimens were numerical chromosomal abnormalities, 40 specimens (19.1%) were structural anomalies, 38 specimens (18.1%) were mosaicisms, and 2 specimens (1.0%) showed regions of homozygosity.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>CMA analysis of products of-conception specimens can yield a higher diagnostic rate than conventional karyotyping. The identification of the cause of spontaneous miscarriage can facilitate estimation of recurrence risks for future pregnancies.</p>
Sujets)
Femelle , Humains , Grossesse , Avortement spontané , Génétique , Aberrations des chromosomes , Études de cohortes , Caryotypage , Analyse sur microréseau , MéthodesRésumé
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the feasibility of chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA) for studying the correlation between birth defects and chromosomal aberrations.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 2000 patients with birth defects were recruited for the CMA testing.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Five hundred twenty two patients (26.1%) were found to have chromosomal abnormalities. These included 24 cases with numerical abnormalities, 11 with mosaicisms, and 11 with uniparental disomies. The remaining 476 cases were of well-known microdeletion or microduplication syndromes. The advantage of CMA over conventional karyotyping was demonstrated in many cases.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>As a powerful tool for patients with birth defects, CMA can produce a higher diagnostic yield compared with conventional karyotyping.</p>