Résumé
Objectives@#The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference between right and left femur bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. @*Methods@#We performed a retrospective chart review of postmenopausal women who underwent bone mineral density (BMD) measurement from 2010 to 2019 at a single center using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data, including BMD and T-scores of bilateral hip and lumbar spine, was gathered for all postmenopausal women above the age of 50 years. The continuous variables were expressed as means with standard deviation for normal distribution and analyzed with a two-sample t-test. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the effect of underlying medical conditions on T-score of bilateral hips. For all analyses, a p-value of ＜0.05 was considered significant. @*Results@#346 patients were included in the study with a mean age at imaging of 62 + 9.7 years and body mass index (BMI) of 23.4 + 6.1 kg/m2 . There were no significant differences between right and left femoral BMDs in all patients. There were significant differences in BMD of both total femurs in women in their 60s and women with normal BMD. There was no difference in both femur BMDs between those taking hormone therapy and those not taking hormone therapy. In patients undergoing osteoporosis treatment, there was a difference in the BMD of both femur neck. Calcium and vitamin D intake were not associated with differences between both femur BMD. We found a significant correlation between the BMD measures at lumbar spine and both femur (p ＜ 0.01). @*Conclusion@#There were no significant differences between right and left femoral BMDs in postmenopausal women. Therefore, BMD may be measured at either hip. The correlation of bone density between lumbar spine and femur neck is shown to be statistically meaningful. Based on the knowledge of the correlation coefficients between lumbar spine and femur neck, it seems possible to predict the BMD result of one location through the measurement of another.
Résumé
Objective@#In this video, we present our novel technique for myometrial defect closure following robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy. @*Methods@#A narrated video demonstration of our technique. Our patient was a 47-year-old single woman with severe dysmenorrhea, who did not respond to medical therapy and wished to preserve her uterus. Surgery was performed after thorough counseling and obtaining informed consent from the patient (Institutional Review Board number: KC17OESI0238; approval date: March 19, 2018). After removal of the adenomyotic tissue during surgical intervention, the myometrial defect was closed in three steps. First, the defect between the anterior and posterior innermost myometrial layers was closed using a 2-0 Stratafix suture, CT-1 (circle taper) needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). Next, the two sides were approximated using a 2-0 PDS® (polydioxanone) Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) and V-34 (TAPERCUT®) surgical needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). Finally, the serosa was sutured in a baseball fashion using a 2-0 PDS suture, slim half-circle [SH] needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). @*Results@#The patient had no postoperative complications, and her pain was greatly improved. The CA125 level decreased from 434 U/mL to 45.99 U/mL, and the transvaginal ultrasound showed a reduction in posterior myometrial thickness from 5.61 cm to 2.69 cm. @*Conclusion@#This technique maintained the integrity of the endometrial cavity, posterior myometrial thickness, and uterine layer alignment. We believe that it is a feasible technique and may be a solution for adenomyosis in patients seeking for fertility preservation.
Résumé
Objective@#In this video, we present our novel technique for myometrial defect closure following robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy. @*Methods@#A narrated video demonstration of our technique. Our patient was a 47-year-old single woman with severe dysmenorrhea, who did not respond to medical therapy and wished to preserve her uterus. Surgery was performed after thorough counseling and obtaining informed consent from the patient (Institutional Review Board number: KC17OESI0238; approval date: March 19, 2018). After removal of the adenomyotic tissue during surgical intervention, the myometrial defect was closed in three steps. First, the defect between the anterior and posterior innermost myometrial layers was closed using a 2-0 Stratafix suture, CT-1 (circle taper) needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). Next, the two sides were approximated using a 2-0 PDS® (polydioxanone) Suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) and V-34 (TAPERCUT®) surgical needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). Finally, the serosa was sutured in a baseball fashion using a 2-0 PDS suture, slim half-circle [SH] needle (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). @*Results@#The patient had no postoperative complications, and her pain was greatly improved. The CA125 level decreased from 434 U/mL to 45.99 U/mL, and the transvaginal ultrasound showed a reduction in posterior myometrial thickness from 5.61 cm to 2.69 cm. @*Conclusion@#This technique maintained the integrity of the endometrial cavity, posterior myometrial thickness, and uterine layer alignment. We believe that it is a feasible technique and may be a solution for adenomyosis in patients seeking for fertility preservation.