RÉSUMÉ
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy,safety and impact on the quality of life of anlotinib in third-line and above treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Methods All the patients received alotinib 12 mg/d.One cycle was defined as 2 weeks on-treatment followed by 1 week off-treatment until disease progression or treatment intolerance.Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 was used to assess tumor responses.Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.02 was used to assess the adverse events.The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 were used to assess quality of life.Results Among 27 patients in study,no complete response (CR) was found,2 patients (7.4％) achieved partial response (PR),16 patients (59.3％) achieved stable disease (SD),9 patients (33.3％) achieved progressive disease (PD),objective response rate (ORR) was 7.4％,and disease control rate (DCR) was 66.7％.The scores of physical functioning (76.00 ± 10.55 vs.64.44 ± 11.59),emotional functioning (81.67 ± 8.71 vs.76.11 ±6.71) and global health status (48.87 ±7.97 vs.40.56 ± 12.49) of the QLQ-C30 scale after treatment were higher than those before treatment,with statistically significant differences (t =-4.516,P ＜0.001;t=-2.646,P=0.019;t=-3.872,P=0.002).Fatigue (50.37±8.95 vs.40.74±13.86),nausea and vomiting (26.54 ± 16.18 vs.14.20 ± 11.97),loss of appetite [M(QR):33.33 (33.33) vs.33(33.33)] were better than before (t =-2.476,P =0.027;t =-5.036,P ＜0.001;Z =-2.923,P =0.003);pain (28.88 ± 14.23 vs.33.33 ± 13.60) and dyspnea [33.33 (33.33) vs.33.33 (66.67)] scores were lower than before (t =3.674,P =0.003;Z =-3.266,P =0.001).The scores of cough (24.44 ±19.12 vs.45.24 ±20.34),shortness of breath [11.11(22.22) vs.33.33(22.22)] and chest pain [0.00(33.33)vs.33.33 (33.33)] in the QLQ-LC13 scale after treatment were lower than those before treatment,with statistically significant differences (t =4.000,P =0.001;Z =-4.125,P ＜0.001;Z =-1.890,P =0.034);the scores of sore mouth or tongue [0.00(33.33) vs.0.00(0.00)] and hands and feet tingling [33.33(33.33) vs.0.00(0.00)] were higher than before (Z=-2.000,P=0.046;Z=-2.264,P=0.024).Common adverse reactions included hypertension,fatigue,elevated thyroid stimulating hormone,proteinuria,hand-foot syndrome,oral mucositis,hemoptysis,etc,mainly grade 1-2,and they were all improved after the treatments.Conclusion Anlotinib as a third-line and further therapy is positive effected and well tolerated.It can alleviate the clinical symptoms and significantly improve the quality of life of NSCLC patients.
RÉSUMÉ
Obj ectiev The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of bone metastasis on survival in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),Which were treated with gefitinib for more than 6 months,and to identify the prognostic factors of patients with NSCLC presenting bone metastasis .Methods We compared the overall survival(OS), progression-free survival(PFS),1-year2,-year and 3-year survival rates between two cohorts based on bone metastasis ,as well as the prognostic factors in the patients with bone metastasis .Results In total, 76 patients were included in the study ,in which there are44 patients with no bone metastasis and32 patients with bone metastasis.The cohorts were similar in OS (19.000 ±3.317 months vs.26.000 ±2.121 months,P =0.625)as well as PFS (14.000 ±1.843 months vs.16.000 ±1.411 months,P=0.328).The 1-year survival rate was 63.6%in no bone metastasis cohort,but was increased to 96.9%in the other cohort.The survival rates at 2 years(34.1%vs.56.3%,P=0.054)and 3 years(18.2%vs.18.4%,P=0.950)were similar.The univa-riate analysis showed that a worse prognosis was more likely existed in elderly patients ( aged >60 years) and with pulmonary progression ,whereby factors including gender ,pathology s,moking index ,brain metastases ,bone related events and the application of radiotherapy ,bisphosphonates might not be independently associated with the surviv -al late.Analysis of multiple variables indicated a favorable prognosis for patients with no pulmonary progression . Conclusion This retrospective study shows that bone metastasis may not shorten the survival in patients whose pulmonary lesion was controlled by gefitinib .On the contrary ,pulmonary progression may be more likely the cause of death in patients with bone metastasis .Non suggestion is given to discontinue gefitinib when the bone metastasis appears.