Résumé
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a disorder of neonatal retinal vascularization. The incidence is increasing in developing countries like India in view of the rising numbers of preterm deliveries and improved neonatal care. Traditional modalities of treatment included cryotherapy and laser therapy, which were laborious and required special training. Hence, research is on way to find novel treatment modalities directed at various levels of pathogenesis for this blinding disease. We reviewed the published and unpublished literature on newer methods of ROP management. The pathogenesis of ROP has been studied with respect to the mediators of angiogenesis. Anti vascular endothelial growth factor (Anti-VEGF) therapy has been extensively studied and the studies have demonstrated its promising role early stages of ROP. The role of Insulin like growth factor (IGF), Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF), and June kinases (JNK) inhibitors are being studied by various researchers across the world. Gene therapy holds promise in the reversal of ROP changes.
Résumé
Background & objective: Oral submucous fibrosis is a common premalignant condition caused by chewing arecanut and other irritants in various forms. Its medical treatment is not yet fully standardized, although the optimal doses of its medical treatment is in the form of hydrocortisone acetate combined with hyaluronidase. The problem with the prevailing treatment was injections at weekly interval. In this study we compared the efficacy of hydrocortisone acetate and hyaluronidase at weekly interval versus triamcinolone acetonide and hyaluronidase at 15 days interval. Methods: Patients of OSMF (100) were randomly divided into two groups A and B. Group A patients received combination of hydrocortisone acetate (1.5 ml)/hyaluronidase (1500 IU) at weekly interval submucosally in pterygomandibular raphe, half dose on each side for 22 wk. Group B patients received combination of triamcinolone acetonide (10 mg/ml)/ hyaluronidase (1500 IU) at 15 days interval for 22 wk. Treatment outcome was evaluated on the basis of improvement in symptom score, sign score and histopathological improvement. Student’s ‘t’ test was applied for comparing the results. Results: No statistically significant difference in symptom score, sign score and histopathological improvement was seen between the two groups. Interpretation & conclusion: Treatment regimen of group B was more convenient to the patients because less number of visits required and cheap. No side effects were seen. A follow up study is required to see long term effects.