RÉSUMÉ
The outcomes of sepsis clinical practice guideline (CPG) implement were not complete because of ineffective CPG management. This analytic study was conducted to compare effectiveness of sepsis CPG before and after sepsis-coordinator nurse system implementation by retrospective review of medical records during February to April, 2007 and compared to those of post-period during June to July, 2007. The primary effectiveness was early goal-directed therapy (EGDT). The secondary goals were organ failure, ICU length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test were used with significant level at 0.05. There were 77 patients in both pre- and post-periods. Age and gender of patients in pre-and post-periods were not different (p=0.105, p=0.258 respectively). The most common cause of sepsis in both pre- and post-periods was pneumonia. Septic mortality rate was not different (p=0.519). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was significantly reduced (p
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcome before and after application of clinical practice guideline (CPG) for sepsis. METHOD: The study was an observational study with historical control. The data of pre-guideline period collected by retrospective review of medical records during August 1st to October 30th 2005 were compared to those of post-guideline period collected during February 1st to April 30th 2006. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome were organ failure, ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay. Data analysis used the computer’s package for chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test with significant level at 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy three patients with sepsis or septic shock were included; 90 patients in pre-CPG period and 83 patients in post-CPG period. Baseline characteristics of patients in pre-CPG and post-CPG periods were comparable. The common causes of sepsis were pneumonia, urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal and intra-abdominal infection, consecutively. Hospital mortality rate was significantly reduced from 73.3% in pre-CPG period to 54.2% in post-CPG period (p=0.01). With regard to organ failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome was significantly increased from 26.7% to 44.9% (p=0.02) during the same period. Meanwhile, proportion of acute tubular necrosis and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy were found to be greater after introduction of the guideline. Furthermore, the length of ICU stay and total hospital stay trended longer in post-CPG period. CONCLUSIONS: The CPG for sepsis is effective in reducing in-hospital mortality. The reciprocal increase in morbidity, acute respiratory distress syndrome indicates that the CPG implementation might imperfect and requires further improvement.