Résumé
Background: There are a wide range of diagnostic markers for colorectal cancers like detection of mutated KRAS, TP53, and APC genes. However, genetic and immunological factors have also been attributed to the cancer prognosis. The present study was carried out to evaluate the expression of CTLA-4 in colorectal cancers. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out among 30 resected specimens of colorectal cancer. Paraffin blocks were made on samples from tumor areas along with adjacent normal areas. Immunohistochemistry for CTLA-4 was done on the sections along with controls. Gross findings were recorded from the blocks. Blocks with section containing normal epithelium and tumor were chosen for immunohistochemistry. Results: Overexpression of CTLA-4 was observed in 43.3% of the tumors. There was a significantly high tumor infiltration among those specimens showing overexpression of CTLA-4. The observed difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). On comparing the grade of the tumor with intensity of CTLA4 uptake, it was observed that majority of the well-differentiated tumors (66.7%) had an intensity of 1+ whereas majority of the poorly differentiated tumors had an intensity of 3+ (66.7%). Conclusion: The present study has demonstrated overexpression of CTLA-4 in colorectal cancer specimens, and also highlighted the potential scope for anti-CTLA-4 agents like Ipilimumab in cancer therapy. The need for further evaluation to examine five-year survival with such immunotherapies is essential to document candid therapeutic recommendations for colorectal cancers.
Résumé
Introduction: Imaging-guided breast tissue biopsy has become an acceptable alternative to open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions. Discussion of abnormal results of the correlation between imaging and pathological findings can be very challenging as it can assist in decision-making with regard to the further treatment options by arriving at a comprehensive diagnosis. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study. Radiological data from imaging-guided breast biopsies of 500 patients during a 6-year period was collected and classified by a specialist radiologist as per the BI-RADS format. Histopathology reports were studied and discordance analyzed. Results: A total of 500 cases were reviewed. Approximately 33% (168) cases fell into the BI-RADS 3 category, 24.4% (122) into the BI-RADS 4, and 37% (187) into BI-RADS 5 categories. Approximately 50% (n = 250) cases were benign, 2.6% (13) belonged to the high-risk category, and 47.4% (237) were malignant. The number of discordant cases was 12 (2.4%), mostly due to technical factors. Sensitivity of biopsies to detect malignancy was 85%, specificity was 96%, and accuracy of biopsy in diagnosing cancer was 90%. Discussion: The "triple assessment" is the most sensitive method for detecting early breast cancer. An effective communication pathway must be established between a clinician, radiologist, and pathologist for surgical excision in discordance as it carries a high prevalence of carcinoma in these lesions. Conclusion: In discordant cases, either due to abnormal results of imaging or of abnormal pathological findings, the final decision is based on two concordant findings, out of the three parameters. This involves a multidisciplinary breast conference and an active participation by the pathologist.