Biventricular pacing improves clinical behavior and reduces prevalence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of biventricular pacing (BP) on clinical behavior, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) prevalence, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) by gated ventriculography. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and NYHA class III and IV underwent pacemaker implantation and were randomized either to the conventional or BP group, all receiving BP after 6 months. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were in NYHA class IV (66.6 per cent) and 8 were in class III (33.4 per cent). After 1-year follow-up, 14 patients were in class II (70 per cent) and 5 were in class III (25 per cent). Two sudden cardiac deaths occurred. A significant reduction in QRS length was found with BP (p=0.006). A significant statistical increase, from a mean of 19.13 ñ 5.19 per cent (at baseline) to 25.33 ñ 5.90 per cent (with BP) was observed in LVEF Premature ventricular contraction prevalence decreased from a mean of 10,670.00 ñ 12,595.39 SD or to a mean of 3,007.00 ñ 3,216.63 SD PVC/24 h with BP (p<0.05). Regarding the hospital admission rate over 1 year, we observed a significant reduction from 60. To 16 admissions with BP (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with LBBB and severe heart failure experienced, with BP, a significant NYHA class and LVEF improvement. A reduction in the hospital admission rate and VA prevalence also occurred.

Marcapasso atrioventricular. Incidência e causas de reprogramações em seguimento a longo prazo / Atrioventricular pacemaker. Incidence and causes of reprogramming in long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of problems requiring reprogramming of atrioventricular pacemakers in a long-term follow-up, and also the causes for this procedure. METHODS: During the period from May '98 to December '99, 657 patients were retrospectively studied, An actuarial curve for the event reprogramming of the stimulation mode was drawn. RESULTS: The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 178 months (mean = 81 months). Eighty-two (12.4 percent) patients underwent reprogramming of the stimulation mode as follows: 63 (9.5 percent) changed to VVI,(R/C); 10 (1.5 percent) changed to DVI,C; 6 (0.9 percent) changed to VDD,C; and 3 (0.5 percent) changed to DOO. The causes for the reprogramming were as follows: arrhythmia conducted by the pacemaker in 39 (37.6 percent) patients; loss of atrial sensitivity or capture, or both, in 39 (38.6 percent) patients; and microfracture of atrial electrode in 5 (4.9 percent) patients. The stimulation mode reprogramming free probability after 15 years was 58 percent. CONCLUSION: In a long-term follow-up, the atrioventricular pacemaker provided a low incidence of complications, a high probability of permanence in the DDD,C mode, and the most common cause of reprogramming was arrhythmia conducted by the pacemaker