Prevalencia serológica del virus de influenza A en cerdos en Argentina durante la temporada 2002: evaluación mediante inhibición de la hemaglutinación y ELISA / Seroprevalence of the swine Influenza virus in fattening pigs in Argentina in the 2002 season: evaluation by hemagglutination-inhibition and ELISA tests

Se evaluó la prevalencia serológica del virus de influenza mediante las pruebas de inhibición de la hemaglutinación (IHA) y ELISA para los subtipos H1N1 y H3N2 en 13 granjas porcinas de Argentina. Se compararon los resultados obtenidos mediante ambas pruebas en términos individuales y de establecimientos. La prevalencia individual por la técnica de IHA fue de 38,46% a 100% para H1 y de 7,69% a 100% para H3. Por la técnica de ELISA, la prevalencia individual fue de 2,33% a 6,9% para H1 y de 9,65% a 48% para H3. No se observaron diferencias significativas entre ambas técnicas a escala de granja (H1: p=0,20; H3: p=0,11). La concordancia entre las pruebas fue nula al tomar como unidad de referencia el animal (H1: 0,005; H3: 0,070), mientras que en términos de establecimiento fue escasa (H1: 0,350; H3: 0,235). Considerando la alta prevalencia individual obtenida por la prueba de IHA y la alta sensibilidad de esta técnica, se podría sugerir que en las poblaciones porcinas de la Argentina circularon cepas virales humanas o cepas porcinas con gran proximidad filogenética a las utilizadas en este estudio desde el año 2002.

The seroprevalence of the Influenza virus against H1N1 and H3N2 was determined by the hemagglutination-inhibition test (HI) and a commercial swine influenza ELISA kit, in 13 Argentinean swine herds. The results of within-herd and between-herd prevalence obtained by both tests were statistically correlated. The within-herd prevalence observed by the HI test varied from 38.46 to 100% against H1 and 7.69 to 100% for H3. When the within-herd prevalence was measured with the ELISA test, it varied from 2.33 to 6.9% for H1 and 9.65 to 48% for H3. No statistical differences were observed at herd level between HI and ELISA (H1: p = 0. 20; H3: p=0.11). No agreement between HI and ELISA detected prevalence was observed when the within-herd prevalence was compared (H1: 0.005; H3: 0.070), while the agreement at herd level was considered poor (H1: 0,350; H3: 0,235). The high within-herd prevalence values observed with the HI test and the high sensibility of this test might show that human strains or swine strains phylogenetically closely related to the humans strains used in the HI test in this study have been affecting the swine population since 2002.

Campylobacter jejuni y C. coli en suinos abortados: comparación entre la identificación fenotípica y los perfiles proteicos en geles de poliacrilamida / [Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in aborted swine: comparison between phenotypic identification and polyacrylamide gel protein profiles]

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli were isolated from aborted pig fetuses which proceeded from different animals and farms between February 2000 and March 2001. Seven Campylobacter jejuni biotype II, three biotype I and one Campylobacter coli biotype I were identified by phenotypic tests and Lior’s scheme. To corroborate and compare the phenotypic results, 7.5, 10 and 12.5

polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were used under reducing conditions. Characteristic bands of hypervariable dense zone within C. jejuni and C. coli species were observed in all the whole cell protein extracts with differences in mobility. It was possible to establish differences between identical phenotypic Campylobacter isolates and different protein profile from fetuses of the same litter. SDS-PAGE is a stable and reproducible method to establish differences between Campylobacter strains and is considered applicable for the differentiation of the wide variability of Campylobacter species for epidemiologic purposes.