Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-40769

Résumé

The present study cross-validated self-report pain scales: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Facial Expression Scale (FACES), Color Analogue Scale (CAS) and Poker Chip Tool (PCT) in Thai children aged 5-12 years. The concordance with observational measure, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) was also tested. Among 100 students, test-retest reliability of all self-report measures was moderate to good (K = 0.501-0.712) and only FACES yielded acceptable face validity(IC > 0.5). Validation in 87 patients, all scales showed construct and concurrent validity. FACES was the most preferred scale. Agreement of self-report measures and CHEOPS was better in the age group 5-8 years (K = 0.417-0.826) than 9-12 years (K = 0.231-0.529). In conclusion, FACES is a valid, reliable and practical tool. Self-report measures are more in concordance with CHEOPS in the younger age group.


Sujets)
Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Mesure de la douleur/méthodes , Douleur postopératoire/diagnostic , Auto-évaluation (psychologie) , Thaïlande
2.
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-45035

Résumé

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess 1) agreement and correlation of postoperative pain scores rated by nurses and parents 2) the difference between the pain scores (CHEOPS and FLACC) as rated by nurses and parents 3) effects of parental education on pain rating 4) the ease with which parents could score CHEOPS and FLACC. METHODS: Sixty-nine children, age 1-12 years (median 3.7, IQR 2-6.85 years) underwent herniorrhaphy and hydrocoelectomy under general anesthesia and 69 parents, age 20-65 years (median 32, IQR 37.5-38.5 years) were enrolled in the study. Parents were trained how to score pain using CHEOPS and FLACC by using a videotape of children's pain behaviors. One of 2 nurses who were tested for inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.9) rated the postoperative pain of a child in the recovery room at the same time with his parent by using CHEOPS and FLACC. RESULTS: Agreement (ICC) and Correlation Coefficient (r) between nurses and parents were 0.934-0.979 and 0.898-0.969 respectively (p < 0.001). ICC and r were not influenced by parental education. Pain scores rated by parents using either CHEOPS or FLACC showed no difference between the scoring systems (p = 0.544, 0.166). CONCLUSION: Thai parents could be easily trained how to use pain scales. Parental rating was not different from nurse rating. The agreement and correlation between parents and nurses were very high. The ease of using CHEOPS was not different from FLACC.


Sujets)
Soins ambulatoires , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Femelle , Humains , Nourrisson , Mâle , Évaluation des besoins en soins infirmiers , Mesure de la douleur/méthodes , Douleur postopératoire/diagnostic , Parents , Reproductibilité des résultats , Statistique non paramétrique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche