Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-40296

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of pituitary adenoma treated with conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) versus stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT). METHOD AND MATERIAL: Data of patients with pituitary adenoma treated at Radiotherapy and Oncology unit, Ramathibodi Hospital between 1990 from 2003 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Twenty-two patients were treated with EBRT and 51 patients were treated with SRS/SRT. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival and local control rates were not different between the EBRT and SRS/SRT group (91% vs 100%, p = 0.10; 95% vs 96%, p = 0.33). The 5-year freedom from newly initiated hormonal replacement was 50% in EBRT and 75% in SRS/SRT group (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: At a similar outcome but with lower expense of resources, EBRT should be considered an acceptable radiation technique for patients with pituitary adenoma, especially in developing countries such as Thailand.

2.
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-41897

Résumé

OBJECTIVES: To study the acute effects of radiotherapy after mastectomy and immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated at Ramathibodi Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between January 2004 and March 2005, ten breast cancer patients (age 32-51 years) were treated with postoperative radiotherapy after mastectomy and immediate TRAM flap reconstruction. Medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Radiotherapy was delivered to the chest wall and reconstructed TRAM flap using 6-MV x-ray or Cobalt-60. The total dose was 45 to 50.4 Gy delivered in 25 to 28 fractions. Patients were evaluated weekly during the course of radiation and then at 1 and 2 months after treatment completion to determine acute effects or toxicities of radiation. RESULTS: During radiation, 3 patients developed erythema or mild hyperpigmentation of the skin, and 4 developed moderate hyperpigmentation. Three patients who were treated with Cobalt-60 and/or bolus to the chest wall developed skin desquamation (1 dry desquamation, 2 moist desquamation). No patient required a treatment break because of acute side effects. One patient who received chemotherapy after radiation developed recalled moist desquamation. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy after mastectomy and immediate TRAM flap reconstruction is well tolerated and is not associated with increased acute complication or radiation interruption. The authors have noticed that chemotherapy given after radiation was related to severe skin reaction, so it should be used with caution.


Sujets)
Maladie aigüe , Adulte , Tumeurs du sein/radiothérapie , Carcinome canalaire du sein/radiothérapie , Femelle , Humains , Mammoplastie , Mastectomie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Radiodermite/étiologie , Radiothérapie adjuvante/effets indésirables , Peau/effets des radiations , Lambeaux chirurgicaux
3.
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-39935

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: To report technique and experience of high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical carcinoma and other gynecologic malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between April 2003 and October 2004, ten patients (7-cervical carcinoma, 3-vaginal stump carcinoma) were treated with interstitial implant. Indications for implant include previous hysterectomy and previous pelvic radiation. Patient characteristics, implant technique, and initial outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Transperineal interstitial implant was performed using fluoroscopy-guided technique. Brachytherapy dose/fraction ranged from 500-750 cGy for 1 to 6 fractions. Combined external beam radiation was given in 8 patients. After 5-21 months follow-up, all the patients were alive. Local control was achieved in 9 patients. One patient had persistent disease at the implant site. No acute complication from the procedure or serious late complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Interstitial implant can be a treatment option in patients with gynecologic malignancies who have limitations with standard intracavitary insertion. This technique is feasible, providing good local control without serious complications. However, long-term follow-up is needed.


Sujets)
Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Curiethérapie/méthodes , Carcinomes/radiothérapie , Col de l'utérus/physiopathologie , Études de faisabilité , Femelle , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Dose de rayonnement , Radio-isotopes/administration et posologie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/radiothérapie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche