Résumé
Objective:To explore the effect of continuous pumping normal saline at same infusion speed before flushing or sealing the tube on the hemodynamics of patients with hypovolemic shock receiving norepinephrine.Methods:A total of 56 cases of hypovolemic shock patients receiving norepinephrine via micro-pump were randomly assigned to the observation group and the control group (28 cases in each group). Patients in the control group received conventional operation method to flush or seal the tube, while patients in the observation group continued pumping normal saline at the same infusion speed, followed by flushing or sealing the tube based on the control group. The changes of hemodynamics after flushing or sealing the tube was compared between two groups.Results:After 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 5 min of flush or seal the tube, the systolic blood pressure were (105.4±17.4) mmHg, (106.3±21.3) mmHg, (102.1±14.5) mmHg, (100.6±16.9) mmHg, (101.0±14.3) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), mean arterial blood pressure were (81.1±8.6) mmHg, (82.4±9.9) mmHg, (78.6±7.3) mmHg, (76.9±6.7) mmHg, (75.7±6.5) mmHg in the observation group, lower than those in the control group [(150.6±26.7) mmHg, (151.8±30.1) mmHg, (139.7±29.8) mmHg, (125.3±25.3) mmHg, (114.4±21.6) mmHg and (107.4±11.6) mmHg, (106.1±11.5) mmHg, (98.1±11.1) mmHg, (88.9±9.6) mmHg, (79.5±8.0) mmHg], the differences were statically significant ( P<0.05). After 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min of flush or seal the tube, the diastolic blood pressure were (69.0±10.50)mmHg, (70.5±10.7)mmHg, (66.9±8.3)mmHg, (65.1±6.2)mmHg in the observation group, lower than those in the control group [(85.9±11.6) mmHg, (83.3±8.7) mmHg, (77.3±7.4)mmHg, (70.7±7.2) mmHg], the differences were statically significant ( t value was 10.199-18.464, P<0.05). Conclusions:Before flushing or sealing the tube, continue pumping normal saline at same infusion speed can reduce the risk of abnormal hemodynamics for the hypovolemic shock patients receiving norepinephrine via micro-pump.