Predictores clínicos de bacteriemia en adultos inmunocompetentes hospitalizados por neumonía adquirida en la comunidad / Clinical predictors of bacteremia in immunocompetent adult patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia

Background: The clinical usefulness of blood cultures in the management of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is controversial. Aim: To determine clinical predictors of bacteremia in a cohort of adult patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort of 605 immunocompetent adult patients aged 16 to 101 years (54% male) hospitalized for CAP was studied. The clinical and laboratory variables measured at admission were associated with the risk of bacteremia by univariate and multivariate analysis using logistic regression models. Results: Seventy seven percent of patients had comorbidities, median hospital stay was 9 days, 7.6% died in hospital and 10.7% at 30 days. The yield of the blood cultures was 12.6% (S. pneumoniae in 69 patients, H. influenzae in 3, Gram negative bacteria in three and S. aureus in one). These results modified the initial antimicrobial treatment in one case (0.2%). In a multivariate analysis, clinical and laboratory variables associated with increased risk of bacteremia were low diastolic blood pressure (Odds ratio (OR): 1.85, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.02 to 3.36, p < 0.05), leukocytosis e" 15,000/mm³ (OR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.88, p < 0.009), serum urea nitrogen e" 30 mg/dL (OR: 2.23, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.05, p < 0.009) and serum C-reactive protein e" 30 mg/dL (OR: 2.20, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.97, p < 0.01). Antimicrobial use before hospital admission significantly decreased the blood culture yield (OR: 0.14, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.46, p < 0.002). Conclusions: Blood cultures do not contribute significantly to the initial management of patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. The main clinical predictors of bacteremia were antibiotic use, hypotension, renal dysfunction and systemic inflammation.

Evaluación de los músculos respiratorios en la parálisis diafragmática bilateral / Assessment of respiratory muscle strength in bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis

Measurement of respiratory muscle strength is useful in order to detect respiratory muscle weakness and to quantify its severity. Apropos of a patient with bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, we review the clinical manifestations and methods for assessing the strength of the respiratory muscles. In patients with severe respiratory muscle weakness, vital capacity and total lung capacity are reduced but are a non-specific and relatively insensitive measure. Conventionally, inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength has been assessed by maximal inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures sustained for one second (PIMax and PEMax). The sniffmanoeuvre is natural and probably easier to perform. Sniff pressures are more reproducible and useful measure of diaphragmatic strength. However, the PIMax-PEMax and sniff manoeuvres are volition dependent, and submaximal efforts are most likely to occur in patients who are ill or breathless. Non-volitional tests include measurements of twitch esophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressure during bilateral electrical and magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. Electrical phrenic nerve stimulation is technically difficult and is also uncomfortable and painful. Magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation is less painful and transdiaphragmatic pressure is reproducible in normal subjects. Systematic clinical evaluation and additional laboratory tests allow the diagnosis in most patients with respiratory muscle weakness.

La evaluación de la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios permite diagnosticar y cuantificar la gravedad de la debilidad muscular en diferentes enfermedades. A propósito de un paciente con parálisis diafragmática bilateral, hemos revisado el cuadro clínico y los procedimientos diagnósticos para evaluar la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios. En los pacientes con debilidad muscular respiratoria severa, disminuye la capacidad vital y la capacidad pulmonar total, pero es una medida inespecífica y relativamente insensible. Tradicionalmente, la fuerza muscular respiratoria es evaluada midiendo la presión inspiratoria y espiratoria máximas en la boca sostenidas durante un segundo (PIMax y PEMax). La medición de la presión inspiratoria máxima en la nariz (SNIP) es una maniobra natural, más simple de medir y más reproducible, siendo útil en la evaluación de la fuerza diafragmática. Sin embargo, estas técnicas no invasivas son operador dependiente, por lo tanto, esfuerzos submáximos es más probable que ocurran en pacientes graves o con disnea. Las mediciones de las presiones esofágica, gástrica y transdiafragmática mediante estimulación eléctrica o magnética del nervio frénico no son dependientes de la voluntad y son más confiables. Sin embargo, la estimulación eléctrica del nervio frénico es técnicamente difícil y puede ser incómoda y dolorosa. La estimulación magnética del nervio frénico es menos dolorosa y la medición de la presión transdiafragmática es reproducible en sujetos normales. La evaluación clínica sistemática y los exámenes de laboratorio complementarios permiten establecer el diagnóstico en la mayoría de los pacientes con debilidad de los músculos respiratorios.