Morphometric evaluation of the uncinate process and its importance in surgical approaches to the cervical spine: a cadaveric study

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The uncinate process (UP) has an important role because of its relationship with the vertebral artery and spinal roots. Degenerative diseases cause osteophyte formation on the UP, leading to radiculopathy, myelopathy and vertebral vascular insufficiency, which may require surgical management. This study aimed to evaluate the morphometry of this region to shed light on the anatomy of the UP.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Morphometric data was obtained from 13 male formaldehyde-fixed cadavers. Direct measurements were obtained using a metal caliper. Computed tomography (CT) morphometry was performed with the cadavers in the supine position.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Direct cadaveric measurements showed that the height of the UP increased from C3 (5.8 ± 1.0 mm) to C7 (6.6 ± 0.5 mm). On CT, the corresponding measurements were 5.9 ± 1.2 mm at C3 and 6.9 ± 0.6 mm at C7. The distance between the left and right apex of the UP from C3 to C7 also increased on both direct cadaveric and CT measurements (C3: 20.8 ± 1.0 mm and C7: 28.1 ± 2.4 mm vs. C3: 23.7 ± 3.4 mm and C7: 29.0 ± 3.0 mm, respectively). On CT, the distance between the UP and superior articular process at the C3 to C7 levels were 9.8 ± 1.7 mm, 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, 7.9 ± 1.6 mm, 7.8 ± 1.3 mm and 8.2 ± 1.7 mm, respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Direct cadaveric and CT measurements of the UP are useful for preoperative evaluation of the cervical spine and may lead to better surgical outcomes.</p>

Misdiagnosis due to the hook effect in prolactin assay

To describe a patient who was misdiagnosed as having a nonfunctional pituitary tumor due to the hook effect on prolactin measurements. A 45-year-old female was admitted with visual disturbances, panhypopituitarism and central diabetes insipidus due to pituitary tumor recurrence. She had been operated 4 times earlier and received cranial irradiation for a suspected nonfunctional pituitary adenoma. Serum prolactin was moderately elevated [164.5 ng/ml], but increased markedly after 1:100 dilution to 14,640 ng/ml. Diagnosis of a giant macroprolactinoma was made and cabergoline was started. Prolactin level normalized and a mild shrinkage of the tumor was achieved after 12 months of therapy. The hook effect must be kept in mind while evaluating a giant pituitary adenoma with moderately elevated prolactin levels. This way unnecessary surgical procedures or irradiation may be avoided