Fitovigilância: avaliação das interações e reações adversas de fitoterápicos no mercado / Phytosurveillance: evaluation of interactions and adverse reactions of herbal medicines on the market

Introdução: O uso de plantas medicinais como insumos farmacêuticos ativos vegetais (IFAV), bem como o uso de fitoterápicos e suas associações com outros medicamentos fitoterápicos e os insumos farmacêuticos ativos (IFA) sintéticos, pode resultar em interações que afetem a eficácia e o uso seguro desses. O principal meio de notificações de reação adversa a medicamento (RAM) é a voluntária, o que dificulta a identificação e o monitoramento dessas RAM e retrata a importância da farmacovigilância em nosso país, realçando a necessidade de fortalecimento da cultura de notificação de eventos adversos a medicamentos (EAM). Objetivo: Analisar a ocorrência de RAM relacionada ao uso simultâneo de cinco fitoterápicos a outros sintéticos, descrevendo as possíveis interações IFAV-IFA sintéticos. Método: Foi realizada pesquisa bibliográfica sobre as interações IFAV-IFA sintéticos e suas notificações de RAM pelos principais sistemas de farmacovigilância do mundo. Resultados: Os principais mecanismos de interação entre IFAV-IFA sintéticos envolvem a metabolização pelas enzimas da família CYP450 ou a ação de transportadores de efluxo como a gp-P. Além disso, grande parte dos EAM fitoterápicos podem não estar sendo notificados, gerando possível subnotificação dessas informações no mundo. Conclusões: Sobre RAM contendo IFAV de Ginkgo biloba, Hypericum perforatum, Matricaria recutita, Allium sativum e Zingiber officinale, foram relatados 7.571 no mundo, classificados por continente, no período de 1971 a agosto de 2021, bem como lista de espécies vegetais da lista do Renisus que apresentam efeitos relatados nas enzimas CYP (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 e 3A4), níveis de GSH, UGT e atividade da gp-P.

Introduction: The use of medicinal plants as active plant pharmaceutical ingredients (APPIs) as well as the use of herbal medicines and their associations with other herbal medicines and synthetic active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) can result in interactions that affect the efficacy and safe use of these. The main means of reporting adverse drug reactions (ADR) is voluntary, which makes the identification and monitoring of these ADRs difficult and portrays the importance of pharmacovigilance in our country, highlighting the need to strengthen the culture of reporting adverse drug events (ADE). Objective: To analyze the occurrence of ADR related to the simultaneous use of five herbal medicines with other synthetics, describing possible synthetic APPI-API interactions. Method: A literature search was carried out on synthetic APPI-API interactions and their notifications of ADR by the main pharmacovigilance systems in the world. Results: The main interaction mechanisms between synthetic APPI-API involve the metabolism by enzymes of the CYP450 family or the action of efflux transporters such as P-gp. In addition, a large part of phytotherapeutic AEM may not be being notified, generating possible underreporting of this information in the world. Conclusions: On ADR containing APPI from Ginkgo biloba, Hypericum perforatum, Matricaria recutita, Allium sativum and Zingiber officinale, 7,571 were reported worldwide, classified by continent, in the period 1971 to August 2021, as well as the list of plant species on the list of RENISUS that have reported effects on CYP enzymes (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4), levels of GSH, UGT and P-gp activity.

Clinical trial for evaluation of Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite as denture cleanser

Abstract The development of opportunistic infections due to poor denture hygiene conditions justified the search for effective hygiene protocols for controlling denture biofilm. Objective This study evaluated Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite solutions in terms of biofilm removal ability, remission of candidiasis, antimicrobial activity, and participant satisfaction. Material and Methods It was conducted a controlled clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, and crossover. Sixty-four denture wearers with (n=24) and without candidiasis (n=40) were instructed to brush (3 times/day) and immerse their dentures (20 min/day) in different storage solutions (S1 / S2: 0.25% / 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; S3: 10% R. communis; S4: Saline).The trial period for each solution was seven days and a washout period of seven days was used before starting the use of another solution. The variables were analyzed at baseline and after each trial period. The biofilm of inner surfaces of maxillary dentures was disclosed, photographed, and total and dyed areas were measured (Image Tool software). The percentage of biofilm was calculated. Remission of candidiasis was assessed by visual scale and score were attributed. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by the DNA-Checkerboard hybridization method. Patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire. Results S1 (4.41±7.98%) and S2 (2.93±5.23%) were more effective then S3 (6.95±10.93%) in biofilm remotion(P<0.0001). All solutions were different from the control (11.07±11.99%). S3 was the most effective solution in remission of candidiasis (50%), followed by S1 (46%). Concerning antimicrobial action, S1/S2 were similar and resulted in the lowest microorganism mean count (P=0.04), followed by S3. No significant differences were found with patient's satisfaction. Conclusions 10% R. communis and 0.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in biofilm removal, causing remission of candidiasis and reducing the formation of microbial colonies in denture surfaces. All solutions were approved by patients.

Antimicrobial activity of complete denture cleanser solutions based on sodium hypochlorite and Ricinus communis: a randomized clinical study

ABSTRACT To preserve oral health and to maintain the prosthetic devices, it is important not only to improve the properties of commonly known hygiene products, but also to investigate new materials with antimicrobial action. Objectives This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite (0.25% and 0.50%) and 10% Ricinus communis’ solutions against specific microorganisms. Material and Methods Sixty four maxillary complete denture wearers were instructed to brush their dentures three times a day and to soak them (20 min/day) in the solutions: SH1: 0.25% sodium hypochlorite; SH2: 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; RC: 10% R. communis oil; and C: 0.85% saline (control). The solutions were used for 7 days in a randomized sequence. Following each period of use, there was a 1-week washout period. Antimicrobial activity was determined by Colony Forming Units (CFU) counts of Streptococcus mutans, Candida spp., and gram-negative microorganisms. For collecting biofilm, the internal surface of maxillary dentures was brushed with saline solution, and biofilm suspension obtained. After dilutions (100 - 10-3), aliquots were seeded in Mitis salivarius, CHROMagar Candida®, and MacConkey agar for detecting S. mutans, Candida spp., or gram-negative microorganisms, respectively. After incubation, colonies were counted, and CFU/mL values were calculated. Then, transformation - log10 (CFU+1) - data were analyzed using the Friedman test (α=0.05). Results showed significant differences between the solutions (p<0.001). Results All three solutions showed antimicrobial activity against S. mutans. Against Candida spp., RC and SH1 solutions showed similar effect while SH2 showed superior activity. SH1 and SH2 solutions showed antimicrobial action against gram-negative microorganisms. The Candida species most frequently isolated was C. albicans, followed by C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. Conclusions The 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was the most effective and might be used to control denture biofilm. C. albicans was the most frequently isolated Candida sp.

Antimicrobial action of sodium hypochlorite and castor oil solutions for denture cleaning – in vitro evaluation

The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antimicrobial action of sodium hypochlorite (0.25% and 0.50%) and 10% castor oil solutions against specific microorganisms, by counting Colony Forming Units (CFU) of clinically important bacteria and Candida species. Acrylic resin specimens (n = 320; Lucitone 550) were obtained from square metal matrices (10 x 10 x 2 mm), sterilized by microwave (650W, for 6 minutes) and contaminated by Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalisand Candida glabrata. The specimens were immersed for 20 minutes in one of the following hygiene solutions (n = 10/each): A – 0.25% Sodium hypochlorite; B – 0.5% Sodium hypochlorite; C – 10% Castor oil solution; and D (Control) – saline. Adhered cells were suspended and inoculated into a selective solid medium (37ºC for 24 h). The Student’s t-test (α = 0.05) was performed to compare log10(CFU+1)/mL between Groups C and D. The results showed that sodium hypochlorite (0.25% and 0.5%) completely eliminated all detectable microorganisms. The castor oil solution eliminatedB. subtilisand reduced counts for other strains. Differences between C and D were significant (p < 0.05) for all species except for E. faecalis. Both sodium hypochlorite solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) were effective in eliminating all microorganisms evaluated, and may be useful as cleaning solutions for complete dentures. The castor oil solution provided moderate efficacy and performed differently on the tested species, with the strongest effect on B. subtilis and with non-significant action on E. faecalis.