Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Indian J Cancer ; 2022 Mar; 59(1): 142-159
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-221745

Résumé

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) using gonadotropin?releasing hormone agonist (s) (GnRH?A) remains the backbone of advanced prostate cancer treatment. In this review, we assessed the efficacy, safety, and convenience of administration of various GnRH?A. All GnRH?A (goserelin, triptorelin, buserelin, histrelin, and leuprorelin) have comparable potential to suppress testosterone (T) levels (?50 ng/dL in a month and ?20 ng/dL in 3 months). However, goserelin has shown better efficacy in maintaining T levels ?50 ng/dL compared with leuprolide. The incidences of T escape are lower with goserelin and leuprolide than buserelin. Goserelin also has maximum benefit in prostate?specific antigen suppression. In neoadjuvant setting, when only goserelin was used, the 10?year overall survival (OS) rate was 42.6% to 86%. When either goserelin or leuprolide was used, the 10?year OS rate was 62%. As an adjuvant to radical prostatectomy, goserelin had a 10?year survival rate of 87%, and triptorelin had an 8?year survival rate of 84.6%. Goserelin further showed an absolute survival rate of 49% when used as an adjuvant to radiotherapy. The survival rates further improved when GnRH?A are used as combined androgen blockade compared with monotherapy. The frequency and severity of adverse events (hot flushes, fatigue, sexual dysfunction) are comparable among the GnRH?A. Goserelin appears to be the most convenient of all the GnRH?A for administration. Lack of conclusive comparative evidence makes it imperative to have a holistic approach of considering the patient profile and the disease characteristics to select the appropriate GnRH?A for ADT in prostate cancer.

2.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol ; 2010 Oct-Dec; 53(4): 796-799
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-141815

Résumé

Leydig cell tumors (LCTs) are rare testicular tumors. They constitute 1-3% of all testicular tumors. We report two cases of LCT, one benign and the other one malignant, representing both ends of the spectrum. The case of benign LCT presented with infertility and was found to have azoospermia, and subsequently underwent orchidectomy. Histopathologic examination revealed the presence of a benign LCT. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. The sperm count improved subsequently, and a year later, he fathered a child. The case of malignant LCT was seen in another 47 year old male who presented with cough. On examination, a testicular swelling was found, and after orchidectomy, he was diagnosed to have malignant LCT on histopathologic examination.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche