A comparison of the success rate of radial artery cannulation between the ultrasound?guided and conventional palpation techniques in elderly patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery

Background:Ultrasound?guided (USG) radial artery cannulation against the standard palpation technique increases the first attempt rate in both pediatric and adult patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefits of USG versus the palpation technique in improving the first attempt rate in elderly patients. Methods: The patients over 65 years of age were randomized to the USG or Palpation group. The radial artery identification in the USG group was performed with the aid of the Sonimage HS 1. In the Palpation group, the radial artery was identified by manual palpation. The operators were cardiothoracic anesthesiologists. Overall success was defined as cannulation completed within 10 min. Results: Eighty patients (40 in each group) were recruited. The respective first attempt and overall success rate for the USG group were similar to the Palpation group (P > 0.999 and P = 0.732). The time to the first attempt and overall success were also similar (P = 0.075 and P = 0.636). The number of attempts, number of catheters used, and failure rates were similar between the groups (P = 0.935, P = 0.938, and P = 0.723). The number of successful cannulations within 10 min was similar for both the groups as categorized by the radial artery diameter (P = 0.169). Conclusions: The USG did not increase the first attempt or overall success rate of radial artery cannulation in the elderly patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. The time to first attempt and overall success were similar between both the groups. The number of attempts and number of catheters used were similar between both groups.

Less tachycardia in adults when using atropine 0.9 mg compared with 1.2 mg plus neostigmine 2.5 mg.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the increase in heart rate in adults after 0.9 vs. 1.2 mg of atropine plus neostigmine 2.5 mg as the non-depolarizing muscle relaxant reversal agent. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A randomized, double blind, controlled trial on 46 adults ASA I-II, undergoing elective gynecological or general surgery with balanced general anesthesia was performed. The subjects were randomized into two groups, After surgery, the study group received 0.9 mg of atropine, while the control group received 1.2 mg of atropine. Both groups received 2.5 mg of neostigmine simultaneously. RESULTS: The heart rate and blood pressure were taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after the injection. The increase in heart rate and blood pressure between the two groups were compared. The heart rate (at 3, 4, 5, and 6 min) of patients in the study group increased significantly less than that of patients in the control group. There was no significant difference in blood pressure between groups and no side effects occurred. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that 0.9 mg of atropine with 2.5 mg neostigmine can be safely used as the reversal agent for a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant, particularly in patients for whom any increase in heart rate would be harmful.

Surveillance of anesthetic related complications at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence of common anesthetic complications in 2003 at Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand and find the strategies for prevention. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was part of a multi-center study conducted by the Thai Royal College of Anesthesiologists to survey anesthetic related complications in Thailand in 2003. The authors collected data from all the cases receiving anesthesia service at Srinagarind Hospital between January 1 and December 31, 2003, to report the incidence of common anesthetic complications and to assess the need to improve the quality of service. This was a prospective, descriptive study. When any anesthetic complications occurred, they were reported by anesthesia personnel and anesthesiologists. The reporting forms comprised four categories of complications, viz.: respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological and others. Each category of complications has a guidebook for reference in order to correctly fill out the form. All the forms were verified by the principal author then included in the present study. RESULTS: A total of 10,607 patients were included and among these 268 incidents were recorded. The common incidents per 10,000 were desaturation (95.22), cardiac arrest (44.31), re-intubation (29.23), equipment failure (19.80) and difficult intubation (18.86). Main contributing factors were insufficient knowledge and inappropriate decisions. Suggested corrective strategies included quality assurance activities, additional training and improved supervision. CONCLUSION: Despite practical prevention guidelines being in place, the most common anesthesia incident at Srinagarind Hospital was respiratory incident. Continuing quality improvement is needed.