Comparison of Wettability for Ocular Prosthesis Depending on Different Kinds of Artificial Tear Eye Drops

PURPOSE: In this study we compared the surface wettability of ocular prosthesis and depositions depending on different types of artificial tear eye drops. METHODS: The artificial tear eye drops contain sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.1%, 0.18%, 0.3%, carboxylmethylcellulose sodium (CMC), hydroxymethylcelluose + dextran (HMC), propylene glycol + polyethylene glycol (PG), polysorbate 80 (PS) povidone (Pov) were evaluated. Flat rectangular parallelepiped blocks consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or silicone materials were made. One artificial tear eye drop was applied on the surface of two different blocks of artificial eyes using a 23-gauge needle. Then, the static method contact angle was measured by using a contact angle goniometer. To measure the deposits, a petri dish was covered with 3 mL of artificial tear eye drops and dried for 48 hours at room temperature. Then, the light transmittance at the center of the petri dish was measured to investigate the amount of the residue. RESULTS: The contact angles of HA 0.1%, 0.18%, 0.3%, CMC, HMC, PG, PS and Pov on PMMA were 78.69degrees, 84.29degrees, 75.46degrees, 80.93degrees, 66.29degrees, 71.26degrees, 58.40degrees and 70.24degrees, respectively. The contact angles on silicone were 53.68degrees, 60.87degrees, 64.46degrees, 62.78degrees, 38.89degrees, 63.58degrees, 30.68degrees and 51.41degrees, respectively. The largest decrease in transparency was observed in the artificial tear eye drops containing HMC. CONCLUSIONS: The wettability and deposits on the surface of ocular prosthesis can vary based on the components and concentration of artificial tear eye drops. The results from this study should be considered when choosing the right artificial tear eye drops for improving dry eye symptoms in patients wearing ocular prostheses.

Comparison of Wettability for Ocular Prosthesis Depending on Different Kinds of Artificial Tear Eye Drops

PURPOSE: In this study we compared the surface wettability of ocular prosthesis and depositions depending on different types of artificial tear eye drops. METHODS: The artificial tear eye drops contain sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.1%, 0.18%, 0.3%, carboxylmethylcellulose sodium (CMC), hydroxymethylcelluose + dextran (HMC), propylene glycol + polyethylene glycol (PG), polysorbate 80 (PS) povidone (Pov) were evaluated. Flat rectangular parallelepiped blocks consisting of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or silicone materials were made. One artificial tear eye drop was applied on the surface of two different blocks of artificial eyes using a 23-gauge needle. Then, the static method contact angle was measured by using a contact angle goniometer. To measure the deposits, a petri dish was covered with 3 mL of artificial tear eye drops and dried for 48 hours at room temperature. Then, the light transmittance at the center of the petri dish was measured to investigate the amount of the residue. RESULTS: The contact angles of HA 0.1%, 0.18%, 0.3%, CMC, HMC, PG, PS and Pov on PMMA were 78.69degrees, 84.29degrees, 75.46degrees, 80.93degrees, 66.29degrees, 71.26degrees, 58.40degrees and 70.24degrees, respectively. The contact angles on silicone were 53.68degrees, 60.87degrees, 64.46degrees, 62.78degrees, 38.89degrees, 63.58degrees, 30.68degrees and 51.41degrees, respectively. The largest decrease in transparency was observed in the artificial tear eye drops containing HMC. CONCLUSIONS: The wettability and deposits on the surface of ocular prosthesis can vary based on the components and concentration of artificial tear eye drops. The results from this study should be considered when choosing the right artificial tear eye drops for improving dry eye symptoms in patients wearing ocular prostheses.

Comparison of Dorzolamide-Timolol Fixed Combination and Latanoprost, Effects on Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Pulse Amplitude

PURPOSE: To compare dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination (DTFC) and latanoprost with regard to their effects on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA). METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 patients with open angle glaucoma or glaucoma suspect were included in the present study. Patients were divided into 2 groups, DTFC-treated (n = 30) and latanoprost-treated (n = 30). IOP and OPA were measured with dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), before and at least 1 month after treatment. RESULTS: GAT IOP, DCT IOP and OPA decreased by 2.25 +/- 2.23 mm Hg, 1.97 +/- 2.06 mm Hg, and 0.14 +/- 0.88 mm Hg, respectively in the DTFC-treated group. In the latanoprost-treated group, GAT IOP, DCT IOP and OPA was reduced by 2.74 +/- 2.96 mm Hg, 2.06 +/- 3.50 mm Hg, and 0.69 +/- 1.07 mm Hg, respectively. There was no significant difference (p = 0.311) in the decline of IOP between the 2 groups, but OPA of the DTFC-treated group decreased less than the latanoprost-treated group (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in the short-term decline of IOP between the 2 medications. However, the influence of DTFC on OPA appeared negligible in the latanoprost-treated group.