Résumé
Objective:To study the use of different assessment methods in predicting perioperative outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis and decompensated cirrhosis.Methods:A retrospective study was performed on 28 patients with acute cholecystitis and decompensated cirrhosis (MELD ≥ 15) who underwent laparoscopic surgical intervention from January 2016 to August 2020 at the Third People Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. These patients were divided into 2 groups according to the severity of acute cholecystitis grading in the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18): TG18 grade Ⅰ for the mild cholecystitis group ( n=15) and TG18 grade Ⅱ and grade Ⅲ for the moderate and severe cholecystitis group ( n=13). 16 patients with a MELD score ranging from 5 to 15 and with TG18 grade Ⅰ were used as the control group. The operation-related conditions, surgical injuries and surgical complications were compared among the three groups. Results:Of 44 patients with acute cholecystitis and decompensated cirrhosis included in this study, there were 28 males and 16 females, aged (57.3±5.9) years. Significantly more patients in the moderate and severe cholecystitis group (13/13) suffered from cholecystitis due to stone impaction than the control group (11/16) and the mild cholecystitis group (10/15) ( P<0.05). When compared to the control group, patients in the mild cholecystitis group and the moderate and severe cholecystitis group had significant increases in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, amount of abdominal drainage, abdominal drainage time, delayed feeding time and hospital stay ( P<0.05). These perioperative outcomes were further and significantly increased in the moderate and severe cholecystitis group when compared to the mild cholecystitis group ( P<0.05). The blood bilirubin levels, blood creatinine levels and MELD scores after surgery were significantly better in both the mild cholecystitis group and the moderate and severe cholecystitis group on postoperative day 3 when compared to those before treatment ( P<0.05). The Child score was significantly better in the control group after surgery than that before surgery ( P<0.05). The grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the moderate and severe cholecystitis group (11/13) than the mild cholecystitis group (5/15, χ 2=7.479), and the control group (4/16, χ 2=10.208) ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the grade Ⅲ-Ⅴ surgical complication rates among the three groups (all P>0.05). The overall surgical complication rate was significantly higher in the moderate and severe cholecystitis group (12/13) than the mild cholecystitis group (7/15, χ 2=7.385), and the control group (5/16, χ 2=11.023), (all P<0.05). Conclusions:The MELD score when combined with the severity grading for acute cholecystitis of the TG18 was effective to evaluate the perioperative risks of patients with acute cholecystitis and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with a MELD score ≥ 15 and TG18 Ⅱ or Ⅲ had significantly higher risks after minimally invasive surgery.
Résumé
Objective To compare the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (LS + ED) versus open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (OS + ED) in treating portal hypertension using Meta-analysis.Methods Controlled trials comparing LS + ED and OS + ED in treating portal hypertension were electronically searched from Wan Fang Data Knowledge Service Platform,Medalink,CNKI,PubMed,Elsevier,SpringerLink and CBM disc.The most recent search was conducted in April 2015.All the relevant data and references were retrieved and screened.RevMan 5.2 was used for data analysis.Results Eventually,7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or high-quality case-controlled studies involving 468 patients were included into this study.Meta-analysis showed LS reduced blood loss [WMD =214.67,95％ CI 198.74-230.60,P ＜ 0.01],shortened flatus time [WMD =17.72,95％ CI 12.39-23.04,P ＜ 0.01] and postoperative hospital stay [WMD =3.75,95％ CI 3.28-4.23,P ＜ 0.01],while the duration of surgery was shorter in OS (P ＞ 0.05).However,OS was comparable with LS in complication rates.Conclusions Comparing with OS,LS had the advantages of reducing intraoperative blood loss and shortening recovery time after operation.In patients with cirrhosis,portal hypertension and esophageal varices,laparoscopic splenectomy was safe and effective.