Hemodynamic and imaging assessment of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the inovare® proseal using multislice computed tomography

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the hemodynamic performance (i.e., gradients and paravalvular leakage [PVL]) of the new and experimental Braile Inovare® Proseal. Additionally, we aimed to assess pre and postoperatively the aortic annulus and the transcatheter prosthesis using multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Methods: Patients were selected by a multidisciplinary heart team and referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MSCT was performed before and after surgery. Measurements of the aortic valve and prosthesis were conducted and correlated with the valve gradient and residual PVL. Results: Twenty-one patients were selected for the protocol. Patients had a mean age of 79 years and 38% of them were of female sex. The mean EuroSCORE II value was 12.5%±10.8. Mean gradient was reduced from 45.8±11.04 mmHg to 5.59±2.61 mmHg and there were no instances of PVL worse than mild. There were no cases of coronary obstruction or procedural death. Circularity was present in all prostheses evaluated. Circularity indexes for the prostheses were: inflow 0.05±0.03, middle third 0.04±0.02, and outflow 0.04±0.02 (P=0.08). The mean distance between the prosthesis and the left and right coronary ostia were 14.8 mm±3.3 and 17.3 mm±3, respectively. Oversizing was appropriate with a mean of 22.14%±6%. Conclusion: Braile Inovare® Proseal transcatheter device has demonstrated low gradients with low rates of PVL. Oversizing by annular measurements was adequate. MSCT was adequate to evaluate device sizing and has demonstrated preserved expansibility and circularity in the evaluated cases.

Análise crítica dos estudos que mudaram a prática clínica recente: doença valvar / Critical analysis of studies that have changed recent clinical practice: valvular heart disease

Nesta breve análise crítica, discutiremos três estudos com potencial de alterar a prática clínica e as principais diretrizes internacionais no que tange à doença valvar. O estudo PARTNER III foi um estudo que randomizou 1000 pacientes de baixo risco cirúrgico entre troca valvar transcateter e cirurgia convencional, com superioridade da técnica transcateter em um desfecho primário combinado de mortalidade de todas as causas, acidente vascular cerebral (AVC) e re-hospitalização em doze meses de seguimento (8,5%vs.15,1%, p = 0,001). Já o estudo Evolut Low Risk randomizou 1468 pacientes entre as duas técnicas, com um desfecho primário de mortalidade ou AVC incapacitante ao final de dois anos de seguimento que atingiu não-inferioridade na comparação Bayesiana (5,3% transcateter vs . 6,7% cirurgia). Finalmente, discutimos também o estudo COAPT, no qual 614 pacientes foram randomizados entre o dispositivo edge-to-edge MitraClip e o tratamento clínico da insuficiência mitral secundária. Nesses pacientes selecionados, a taxa anualizada de hospitalizações por insuficiência cardíaca foi de 35,8% por paciente-ano no grupo MitraClip, comparado com 67,9% no grupo controle (HR 0,53, IC 95% 0,4-0,7).Nas novas diretrizes, pode-se razoavelmente esperar uma indicação I para a troca valvar transcateter em pacientes de baixo risco e uma indicação IIa para a técnica edge-to-edge em pacientes com características semelhantes aos do COAPT. Esses procedimentos devem ser considerados no contexto do Heart Team para que sejam atingidos os melhores resultados

In this short critical review, we will discuss three trials with the potential to alter clinical practice and the main international guidelines regarding valvular heart disease. The PARTNER III trial was a study of 1000 low surgical risk patients randomized between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and conventional surgery, showing the superiority of the transcatheter technique with a combined primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke and rehospitalization over twelve months of follow-up (8.5%vs. 15.1%, p = 0.001). The Evolut Low Risk trial randomized 1468 patients between the two techniques with a primary endpoint of death or incapacitating stroke at the end of two years of follow-up, achieving non-inferiority in a Bayesian comparison (5.3% TAVR vs. 6.7% surgery). Finally, we also will discuss the COAPT study, in which 614 patients were randomized between the edge-to-edge MitraClip device and clinical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. Among these selected patients, the annual rate of hospitalizations for heart failure was 35.8% per patient-year in the MitraClip group, compared with 67.9% in the control group (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.4-0.7). Under the new guidelines, we may reasonably expect a class I indication for transcatheter valvular replacement in low-risk patients and a class IIa indication for the edge-to-edge technique in patients with characteristics similar to those of the COAPT study. These procedures should be considered within the context of the Heart Team so that the best results are achieved