Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of real-time sonographic images obtained from the examinations using two different sound media, ultrasound gel and olive oil. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on the study population recruited from the routine ultrasound service with written informed consent. Each patient underwent scan using both ultrasound gel and olive oil as sound media, but only one media at a time. During each patient examination, the first type of sound media was randomly used and then followed by the other media. The sonographic images of the same plane were recorded as video clips for each type of sound media. The quality of images were blindly evaluated by one experienced sonographer and the quality of ultrasound images was rated as 0 (very poor), 1 (poor), 2 (fair), and 3 (good), respectively. RESULTS: Of 346 cases (692 video clips), the image quality scores in ultrasound gel group and olive oil group were poor, fair, and good quality in 7, 182, and 157 and 9, 190, and 147 cases, respectively. The difference of quality scores between both groups was not statistically significant. (Chi square test; p = 0.687). CONCLUSION: The quality of images obtained from the scan using olive oil is similar to that using ultrasound gel. Therefore, the olive oil may be used as alternative sound media for ultrasound examination. Furthermore, it could possibly be a preferred media because of its lower cost, pleasant smell, and it facility of cleaning.
Sujets)
Femelle , Gels/économie , Humains , Huiles végétales/économie , Grossesse , Son (physique) , Échographie prénatale/méthodesRésumé
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a scoring system for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses and to detect threshold scores for prediction of malignant ovarian tumors. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional diagnostic testing. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University. SUBJECTS: A total 158 patients scheduled for elective surgery due to ovarian tumors at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between June 16, 2002 and August 8, 2004 were recruited into the study. METHODS: All patients were sonographically examed within 72 hours before surgery by the same sonographer to evaluate the morphology including wall structure, shadowing, septum, echogenicity and score the tumors. The final diagnosis was based on either pathological or operative findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity and specificity of the best cut-off score. RESULTS: A score of 5 from the receiver operating characteristic curve was found to be the best cut-off score, giving a sensitivity and a specificity of 85% and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sonographic morphology scores are useful in distinguishing adnexal malignancies from benign lesions in some selected cases.