Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrer
1.
Article de Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-37380

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of subjective sonographic assessment in distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS: The patients scheduled for elective surgery due to adnexal masses were recruited into the study. All patients were sonographically examined within 72 hours of surgery were subjectively evaluated by the experienced sonographer, who had no any information of the patients, to differentiate between benign and malignant adnexal masses based on sonographic morphology. The final diagnoses, used as gold standard, were based on either pathological or operative findings. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients with 174 adnexal masses, (benign; 108 and malignant; 66) were recruited into the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were of 89.7%, 84.9 % and 92.6 %, 87.5% and 90.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective evaluation of sonographic morphology has high accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.


Sujet(s)
Adénocarcinome mucineux/ultrastructure , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Carcinome endométrioïde/ultrastructure , Études transversales , Cystadénome séreux/ultrastructure , Diagnostic différentiel , Femelle , Humains , Incidence , Adulte d'âge moyen , Stadification tumorale , Tumeurs de l'ovaire/imagerie diagnostique , Valeur prédictive des tests , Courbe ROC , Facteurs de risque , Sensibilité et spécificité , Échographie-doppler
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE